dans59
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8606 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:22 PM |
Haven't checked out Russia vs United States yet? http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=130888871
These numbers are based off of multiple websites, as I didn't want to get it all from one source, doing so, would give me a more accurate result.
United States of America (Military ranking status: 1 (of 106)
Total Population: 316,688,567 - MANPOWER AVAILABLE: 145,212,012 - Fit For Military Service: 120,022,084 - Active Military Personnel: 1,430,000 - Active Military Reserves: 850,880 - Total Aircraft Strength: 13,512 - Total Tank Strength: 8,435 - Total Navy Shop Strength: 473 - Total Carrier Strength: 10 - Patrol Craft Strength: 13 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ China (Military ranking status: 3 (of 106)
Total Population: 1,349,585,839 - MANPOWER AVAILABLE: 749,610,775 - Fit For Military Service: 618,588,627 - Active Military Personnel: 2,285,000 - Active Military Reserves: 2,300,000 - Total Aircraft Strength: 2,788 - Total Tank Strength: 9,150 - Total Navy Shop Strength: 520 - Total Carrier Strength: 2 - Patrol Craft Strength: 353 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Who's the stronger country? You decide. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:23 PM |
| China could not do anything; there military is dated from the 50-60's. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:24 PM |
| U.S. has 100x better tech. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dans59
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8606 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:24 PM |
| If that's what you think... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:26 PM |
L0L your not updated to Chinese military I believe.
China has its own long list of thermonuclear-tipped ICBMs. China has the three-MIRVed DF-31 and DF-31A ICBMs. Also, there are the Chinese DF-5B 10-MIRVed ICBMs. Let's not forget the Chinese DF-41 10-MIRVed ICBMs. Finally, we have the Chinese JL-2 8-MIRVed SLBMs. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:26 PM |
I don't base what I say off of implying.
http://www.wired.com/2011/06/relax-chinas-first-aircraft-carrier-is-a-piece-of-junk/ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:27 PM |
| Because everything that I look up on the internet is true and has all the facts. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:28 PM |
| China's military is only highlighted on several aspects but practically it averages out to being a piece of junk. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:29 PM |
| The Chinese are not to be underestimated. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:29 PM |
@Zapirian517 Look likes someone is to lazy to research on it and instead falls back on an Allstate ad for his rebuttal. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:30 PM |
Lol that carrier strength.
China wouldn't be able to launch air attacks at us considering their technology and lack of carriers. (Aircraft can't go far and no carriers to refuel) While we would be bombing all of their military bases and factories (with long and short range aircraft). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:32 PM |
Do you know what the Type 001A stands for?
The Type 001 is Liaoning, while the Type 001A means an improved version of Liaoning.
The Type 002 is a completely breakthrough, it will feature three steam capults, two on the bow and one on the angle deck.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:32 PM |
"completely breakthrough, it will feature three steam capults, two on the bow and one on the angle deck."
Just that right there made me laugh. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:34 PM |
Navy rail gun: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQfAcBs5vQ
Navy laser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5qKSKsfUPM
'murica |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:38 PM |
| http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1444732/us-lasers-pla-preparing-raise-its-deflector-shields |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:39 PM |
@Francis
Ever heard of long range strategic bombers? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:40 PM |
| Or we could the HVG WU-14 hypersonic weapon? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tasha5266
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 9077 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:42 PM |
| Numbers don't always bring up facts, you have to be more specific on technology for example as well as training, and so on. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
StuntMike
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2008 |
| Total Posts: 6026 |
|
| |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:43 PM |
oh south china morning post
this just in: The people's republic of korea voted 2nd happiest country in world right behind china
china number one!
have they posted videos of this weapon?
also
I guarantee you that 90% of the weapons that the US would actually use in the war have not been shown to the public considering the $52.6 billion 'black budget' |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
pandatoby
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10351 |
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:43 PM |
1000+ chinese got rekt'd by 200 britain in korea
China technology is bad. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:43 PM |
i vote finland
i drawed a horsey |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:45 PM |
*democratic people's republic of korea
my bad |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Apr 2014 02:45 PM |
| http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-492804/The-uninvited-guest-Chinese-sub-pops-middle-U-S-Navy-exercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|