| |
|
| |
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:31 PM |
probably.
By manpower, sure.
On the seas, HA NO.
The USN could wipe the Chinese navy off the face of the planet in 2 weeks, i believe it is.
They did a study on this.
I'm sure the Russian navy wont stand a chance.
In the Air, the Russians wont even get off the ground, yet alone the Chinese. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:32 PM |
| Russia and China will dominate the lands and skies. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:32 PM |
Now the big test.
How will the Russians and Chinese get troops to the US mainland when they have no ships because the USN already destroyed them, and the Chinese jets get blown up on the flight line(runway)? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:32 PM |
| china's army is to big. not enough weapons and ammo. consider your self lucky getting a gun and even luckier getting ammo. china sends lots of cannon fodder men without guns picks up guns from dead bodies and the cycle continues. also *ahem* how about when japan attacked? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:33 PM |
Submarines And It was flame bait, and you just got caught.
TheDarkMelon <3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:39 PM |
| Russia has many nuclear subs so the water might also be tricky.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:40 PM |
| nuclear subs =/= combat subs |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LordZedex
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4356 |
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:42 PM |
"china's army is to big. not enough weapons and ammo. consider your self lucky getting a gun and even luckier getting ammo. china sends lots of cannon fodder men without guns picks up guns from dead bodies and the cycle continues. also *ahem* how about when japan attacked?"
>this was in ww1/2, things changed
"Russia has many nuclear subs so the water might also be tricky.."
>no country will have the guts to start a nuclear war, anyone with a brain would understand starting a nuclear war will wipe out the planet
you seem to be smashed my good sir |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Syncretic
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 11662 |
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:43 PM |
usa > both
plus its extremely unlikely if russia/usa got in a war china would interfere, china and usa's economies depend on eachother
op is probably an idiot who knows nothing about military but has a chinese background so feels the need to prove asian superiority
midwestern man | hail the midwest ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:43 PM |
You do know what is carried in an actual nuclear sub right? Its quiet, fast. And once again stealthy. They would literally have a peaked edge on the US just because of that.
TheDarkMelon <3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:44 PM |
>USA and Russia never signed the treaty against nuclear weapons
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:44 PM |
| Americans brag about everything. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:44 PM |
Subs are pretty easy to kill.
Besides, subs alone can't carry many troops, and can not carry any vehicles.
Trying to transport troops for a war by sub alone is absolutely stupid. We would just kill all 10 of them as soon as they swim up to the beach, assuming they don't drown first, as you can't exactly beach a submarine. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:45 PM |
Your a dumb and need to learn tactics.
TheDarkMelon <3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:45 PM |
| a nuclear sub carries nuclear weapons not troops. and back in ww2 german sleeper cells infiltrated the US via subs. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:45 PM |
@Fores- Who needs a treaty? We have no desire to use them. It's called Mutually Assured Destruction.
Sure. The Russians can shoot a nuke at us, but the missile actually getting to the Atlantic alone would be shocking, with the misled defense systems we have in Europe.
Not to mention we would return fire, as would all of the other nuclear countries that are our allies. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:46 PM |
| Cyber attack+Submarine and planes attacking bases and harbours+Large amounts of infantry and tanks. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:46 PM |
@Itstime- It's funny that you think a stealthy sub gives the Russians an advantage.
Cause you know. We have them too. Just better, bigger, and more of them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:47 PM |
all you need is a bad president who gets ticked off to start firing nukes.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:47 PM |
| Russia can launch from the east across the Pacific Ocean. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:47 PM |
That's exactly correct.
I hate that the US gives that much power to one man. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Syncretic
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 11662 |
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:47 PM |
if they're elected they'd probably have enough common sense to not destroy the earth with nukes
midwestern man | hail the midwest ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Syncretic
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Dec 2008 |
| Total Posts: 11662 |
|
|
| 28 Mar 2014 09:48 PM |
@drinfu
have you heard of checks and balances
midwestern man | hail the midwest ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|