|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:29 PM |
I haven't seen you prove anything other than that SQL was made first.
Until you can show me all 50 owners of both and show me which ones are and aren't deleted it's hard to trust anything you are saying.
You are making a massive assumption. Which makes you a massive ass. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:32 PM |
@dx i've seen many RS owners in lmad i've seen very few SQL owners
you stated that they have the same in circulation give proof because creation date is an accurate depiction of rarity |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:35 PM |
You want proof?
50 were sold for both hats. That's proof. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:37 PM |
Your logic is invalid
that's like saying that TGC is as rare as MM because they have the same sold
over time, some people go inactive and get deleted SQL is rarer than RS, as less are in circulation, and SQL was made 2 years before RS amount sold ='s nothing |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
pdog417
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 71326 |
|
| |
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:38 PM |
rs is hot
sql is hot
end.
~Hohohoho Travelers I'm gonna have to take those items from you.~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:39 PM |
@noob:
TGC sold 25
Mori sold 26
TGC is more rare. Less TGCs exist. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:40 PM |
"less TGC's exist"
TGC was made a year ago MM was made 4 years ago
MM has more deleted/inactive owners
find me 5 active and trading MM owners I can find 5 trading TGC owners easily |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:41 PM |
tgc > all
~Hohohoho Travelers I'm gonna have to take those items from you.~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:43 PM |
Just because Memento Mori owners aren't here doesn't mean they don't exist.
Cmonnnnnnnnnnnn. I can't even find 5 Ollie owners.
When it was made makes no difference. What matters is how many exist. 26 mori's exist. 25 tgc exist. TGC is rarer because there is one less of it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:43 PM |
tgc master race
~Hohohoho Travelers I'm gonna have to take those items from you.~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:44 PM |
invalid point
Over time, owners dissipate due to deletions/inactiveness
that's like saying that EotF is just as rare as RS it's not, as barely any owners have been deleted/gone inactive rarity comes over time
less made does not mean less in circulation |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
tomtomn00
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 27998 |
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:45 PM |
mm r april fools item iirc
of course it has less
o i dropped da dun dun dun |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:46 PM |
EoTF is just as rare as RS.
There are the same number of RS's in existence as EoTF's. 50. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:47 PM |
sry but RS's on deleted accs dont exist anymore
less in circulation = rarer RS has less in circulation therefore is rarer than EotF |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:49 PM |
RS's on deleted accounts exist, and accounts get undeleted. Nothing on here is permanent despite what they may have you believe.
I was banned for over a year on my main before getting undeleted. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:50 PM |
i am referring to current rarity if 25/26 emp owners get deleted
emp will be considered super rare because the current rarity is 1 in circulation current rarity = the amount in circulation SQL has less in circulation than RS therefore it has a higher current rarity |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:51 PM |
Well yeah and RS has better GPI.
What does that even prove? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:55 PM |
Genuine Progress Indicator.
More accurate than GDP |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:56 PM |
| ya but we were arguing about rarity not potential |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:58 PM |
| GPI determines progress not potential...? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:59 PM |
| you were using progress to give a statement of potential |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 04:59 PM |
| Wanna know what the "stupidest" thing I've heard is? You saying that lol. It's most stupid, want me to show you basic English? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Mar 2014 05:01 PM |
| superlative adjective: stupidest |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|