|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:07 PM |
America+ NATO= Find a rock to live under.
120,000,000 soldiers fit for service. 4.2 million reach military age, annually.
8.3k tanks 25.7k armored fighting vehicles 13.6k aircraft 6k helicopters 473 ships
Defense budget: $612,000,000,000
Like I said, find that rock. Real estate is gonna get tight. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:08 PM |
@anyone who says russia > america
yet russia who had tanks, helicopters, and planes couldn't beat a bunch of guys living in caves who only had ak's and rocket launchers to defend themself? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:09 PM |
| thread defensive shield has now been established. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:09 PM |
russia has like 15k tanks
but it doesnt matter since they're like leftovers from old times
~ spot |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:10 PM |
they got them kv-1s
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つLET IT GO༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:10 PM |
well...err daniel they were backed by the CIA. and with the CIA? the green berets. they were supplied and trained with the green berets. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:11 PM |
Russia's tanks are all from the 70's.
America easily dominates in naval and air based combat. This means blockades, and tanks go bye-bye real quick. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:11 PM |
@Daniel;
Yet America can't either.
It's amazing how landscape affects a war, especially when the indigenous population knows it's way around. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:11 PM |
why did you pretty much restate what i said
i just said they had more
but useless
~ spot |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:12 PM |
| If you want all the info, go to Globalfirepower dot commercial. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:12 PM |
well... the bulk of russia's tank force is T-90s which, if you are a keen learner in numbers, means it was made in 1990s. hmm. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cetronix
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 4362 |
|
| |
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:13 PM |
@Billy
Hence, the American Revolution.
A war that was impossibly against America in every aspect except landscape. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:14 PM |
i sincerely hope you know what you're talking about OP
unless you're a real operator operating operationally |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:15 PM |
@Waffle
This isn't even America+ NATO's combined forces. This is just America.
The UK, Germany, France, and South Korea all make the top 10 in military power. I would hate to do the math and see how absolutely pulverized Russia would be. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:16 PM |
| it's ashame obama won't back up his talk about defending the ukraine and whatnot... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:16 PM |
alright here's the deal: this is simple logic, alright? so there's at least 10 people in a position, right? and there's one dude in cover, so obivously the 10 people should screw him up. however, the 10 people in a group can easily be mowed down the concept comes from the marine corps's idea of "1 marine = 10-20 combatants" it's all down to the concept of orgainization, orgainziation goes out the drain if you disrupt it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:16 PM |
Then you have Russia's Ally, China, and China's ally, North Korea.
Assuming the other European nations choose NATO, Neutrality, or Russia. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:17 PM |
| but waffle we killed osama bin laden which is further then the russians ever got1111 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:18 PM |
i'm not defending russia they just didn't adapt properly. and the fact that the agency and the force multiplyer was there. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:19 PM |
well this is an stalemate.
off i go before i get injected with truth salt serum |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:20 PM |
@Daniel
The only way America and NATO would get military involved is if Russia's troops threatened Poland. By treaty, America would be bound to protect them.
@Billy
I doubt China would get involved. Their economy is already hitting rock bottom, and it isn't getting better. Not to mention the fact that America supplies them with a majority of their cash. However, any chance North Korea has to get involved in a war with America, they will. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:21 PM |
Russia can't support a real-fled war. Their economy is already screwed as it is.
And they don't have alot of stuff to travel all the way to the globe and attack america. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Mar 2014 07:22 PM |
@Awesome
Exactly. I'm not saying that a war between the two largest super powers would be good, I'm just saying that America would most likely win. Especially with NATO involved. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|