2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 07:35 AM |
I put this text in my profile description because i'm strongly against nuclear energy.
Here to show it in the forum:
Nuclear energy can destroy our world. Statiscs are showing that nuclear energy caused the world highest damage of the history. The damage is higher than all the money of the world. There are worldwide 500 nuclear power plants, if terrorists attack them, we would die of radiotion and the humanity wouldn't exist. 3 Nuclear power plants exploded, one in USA, Russia and Japan. The disaster in Japan isn't stpping, it keeps getting worse and Japan can't stop it. Many generations will be affected by a nuclear disaster, because the radiation takes many human lifetimes to reduce. Nuclear waste is a problem too, peoples can't store it in safe places. Some countries are storing it in deserts, some countries are throwing it into the sea and some countries are storing it in mines. If we keep doing that, healthy water would be very rare and don't forget what terrorists can cause. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 07:39 AM |
| this is so damned stupid its unbelievable |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 07:47 AM |
| Let me correct: its's supposed to be in my profile description. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 08:17 AM |
Nuclear energy is a far more realistic idea then all the windmills and solar cells. The waste it produces is nothing compared to all CO2 that fossil fuel plants produce.
#LogicMakesSense |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 08:32 AM |
"Nuclear energy is a far more realistic idea then all the windmills and solar cells. The waste it produces is nothing compared to all CO2 that fossil fuel plants produce."
Nuclear waste can't be removed and has to be stored somewhere CO2 can be removed and it goes into the air.
For peoples who says that nuclear energy is very cheap and good for the economy: Nuclear energy caused a damage of 450 Billion USD right now. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 08:44 AM |
"Nuclear waste can't be removed" It's in a very early stage, it's not sure if it's useless.
Also, it help on the development of Nuclear fusion, which can provide a whole city with energy with only 1 glass of water a year.
#LogicMakesSense |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 08:51 AM |
"Also, it help on the development of Nuclear fusion, which can provide a whole city with energy with only 1 glass of water a year."
Is it safe? What happens if a terrorists attacks it? Will there be global radiation? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 09:06 AM |
Wow, why does everyone uses terrorists as an argument.... It's like saying, what happens if a meteorite crashes on it?
It doesn't produces nuclear waste, it splits hydrogen atoms with beams of light and collects the pure energy. I don't think it will lead to major radiation problems.
#LogicMakesSense |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 09:18 AM |
| there have been about 1000 nuclear weapons tests worldwide IIRC, im sure those contribute more to background radiation than a few accidents. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 09:38 AM |
| Whyaname98, because terrorists are causing damage to kill peoples, for example the world trade center and what does "no major radiation problems" means? The radiation from the disaster in Russia affected whole Europe and made a city uninhabitable(Of course it made peoples ill and the children of the peoples are getting ill too). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 11:38 AM |
| I'm not saying I agree with this thread, but there are better alternatives to Nuclear power, for instance, scientists in Britain have developed a wind turbine which produces 6 times more energy than current turbines, They compress large ammounts of air in a tube, the air goes through and spins a the turbine creating electicity, It can produce as much energy with winds as low as 2 MPH as a current turbine can create in winds up to 50 MPH. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 11:38 AM |
| Chernobyl was in Ukraine... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 11:41 AM |
But you'd still need Hundreds of those wind turbines to power a city, which is still a massive problem. I'd prefer to have Nuclear energy, and live with the Extremely unlikely chance a terrorist may bomb it, rather than having my town flooded due to Polution speeding up the Natural Melt cycle. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 11:53 AM |
"Chernobyl was in Ukraine..."
Let me correct then: Ukraine not Russia.
I prefer living in a world with floods than in a world where you get a deadly illness or cancer in the next 2 years and where you can't eat mushrooms or drink clear water from wells. 1 disaster was enought to affect whole Europe. We have 500 nuclear power plants and the possible damage by terrorsits can get over 1 trillion USD. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Baltik
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1024 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 12:14 PM |
Nuclear Fission is very simple.
The reaction takes place in the Uranium Rods, the reaction produces heat, the heat turns the water to steam, the steam turns a turbine which spins a generator to produce electricity.
This makes accidents VERY unlikely, Chernobyl only exploded because they didn't lower the safety rods, the reaction got out of hand.
Nuclear Fusion will produce more energy and less waste, the Sun uses Nuclear Fusion every second, it's doing pretty well. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 12:19 PM |
"CO2 can be removed and it goes into the air." Yes, but then we all die from breathing it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 12:23 PM |
"The reaction takes place in the Uranium Rods, the reaction produces heat, the heat turns the water to steam, the steam turns a turbine which spins a generator to produce electricity."
It's still using uranium rods, which are causing nuclear waste and radiation.
"This makes accidents VERY unlikely, Chernobyl only exploded because they didn't lower the safety rods, the reaction got out of hand."
And what about the disaster in Japan or USA? A nuclear disaster can cause a damage over a billion USD. Don't forget terrorsits nuclear power plants weren't their target yet but it might be a new target for them and it wouldn't be just an "accident" then.
"Nuclear Fusion will produce more energy and less waste, the Sun uses Nuclear Fusion every second, it's doing pretty well."
Can peoples live on the sun? The sun is a great example why we shouldn't use nuclear energy! Waste is a big problem because no person found a safe way to store them and you can't just recycle nuclear waste, because it's radioactive for million years. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 12:24 PM |
"Yes, but then we all die from breathing it."
Yes, we can plant trees to make the CO² turn into Oxygen! What is your solution for nuclear waste? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 12:28 PM |
"Yes, we can plant trees to make the CO² turn into Oxygen!" Yet we cut down trees to actually make the fossil fuel plants. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 12:32 PM |
"Yet we cut down trees to actually make the fossil fuel plants."
We won't have fossil fuels in the future and we can restrict cutting rainforests! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 04:19 PM |
Use. The. New. Wind. Turbines. Seriously. They. Are. Like. The. Most. Efficient. And. Easy. Way. To. Produce. Energy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 04:22 PM |
>wut eef da terrarists atak eet
Your points are now invalid |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Baltik
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Oct 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1024 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 06:19 PM |
Wind turbines are eco-friendly, but not yet efficient enough to meet the energy demand. The nuclear explosion in Japan was the result of an earthquake/tidal wave occurance, accidental.
Terrorists could target nuclear reactors it is true, but they generally have more security than a Communist airport... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 14 Mar 2014 06:34 PM |
"Terrorists could target nuclear reactors it is true, but they generally have more security than a Communist airport..."
They can start polluting water with nuclear waste and they aren't secured, because countries are storing them in mines or they just throw it into the sea. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|