|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:09 PM |
| still mad you lost to our skilled soldiers in the revolution X'D |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:10 PM |
Please. All you managed to do was lift your butts to do some heavy booty work pushing crates of tea in the sea.
The Pokerhead of Courtroom No. 4 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vaporized
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17608 |
|
| |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:11 PM |
| and kick ass in actual battles ugh idiot |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
tjlollol
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 336 |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:13 PM |
if there wasn't a UK then there wouldn't be a USA so..
just saying |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:14 PM |
Stop with the pathetic arguments.
The whole topic is a load of crap made up by a bunch of egotistical liars who are looking for attention. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:15 PM |
| if there wasn't a usa in world wars one and two there wouldn't be a uk |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Annaplz
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Mar 2014 |
| Total Posts: 188 |
|
| |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:15 PM |
LOL. OH MY GOD DYING XDDDDDDDDDDD AMERICAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- im not gonna lie, kid. there was never any candy. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
squidboi2
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 52336 |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:15 PM |
| god if we'd of known just how much the british would whine, maybe we'd of left you guys out to dry in both world wars, geez. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:16 PM |
| ultimate i'm just playing around i thought you'd know me by now |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:16 PM |
"if there wasn't a usa in world wars one and two there wouldn't be a uk"
Actually if there was no USA.
britain would probably own most of the entirety of the north american continent.
So if WWI did happen, Britain would have won it because of the reinforcements from the Americas. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
crplsteve
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8638 |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:17 PM |
What the wars that we were fighting while you were ignoring genocide?
Also the uk and Russia were 2 key countries that were needed for victory USA just shortened the war by throwing meat into the grinder. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:18 PM |
yeah no matter what americans say mostly all of them have british ancestors except the descendants have more deformed bodies the excuse "i have a hollow leg" really means "i can still fit in a corner shop so i can still eat"
The Pokerhead of Courtroom No. 4 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:19 PM |
| i actually come from german descent |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:19 PM |
"still mad you lost to our skilled soldiers in the revolution X'D"
What. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
tjlollol
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Sep 2013 |
| Total Posts: 336 |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:20 PM |
''if there wasn't a usa in world wars one and two there wouldn't be a uk''
i disagree
even if the US played a part
you'd still need the soviet union to help us, they played a big part in defeating germany |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cirvius
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 18817 |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:20 PM |
| if the united states and russian hadn't joined ww2 (which both were basically forced too), almost all of europe (including the uk) would be german territory |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:20 PM |
I think Britain has achieved more in it's years than America ever will.
Look at America and Vietnam, lol. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:20 PM |
| if by big part you mean least kills and moss deaths then you're right |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:21 PM |
wrong, their military would be far too spread out one attack could liberate the whole of the uk
The Pokerhead of Courtroom No. 4 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:22 PM |
"if there wasn't a UK, there wouldn't be a USA"
awkward moment when you realize Spain were the first people to step foot in the usa
and that awkward moment with your logic "if there wasn't an Africa there wouldn't be anything" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:23 PM |
the UK didn't put their full military force into the american conflict, especialy not their navy
they had a massive global overseas empire to run
the king wanted to continue the war after yorktown, but parliament refused if they would have continued, the land of mcdonalds wouldn't be here, same as if they put all/most of their military effort into the conflict
the americans also used cowardly and pathetic tactics in most of the skirmishes and battles
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Vaporized
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 17608 |
|
|
| 07 Mar 2014 07:24 PM |
| well nobody mentions that usa pretty much supported uk in war supplies & money throughout the entire world war 1.. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|