2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2014 05:32 PM |
Like nuclear missles.
Discuss. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
kitty234
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 9369 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2014 05:33 PM |
| Yes, other countries have nuclear capabilities so we have to have a deterrence from a nuclear strike. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
lagio5
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Mar 2010 |
| Total Posts: 5640 |
|
|
| 04 Mar 2014 05:33 PM |
| WMD is almost never justified, unless the nation it is being used against has pretty much violated all humans rights laws and commited more atrocious acts |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Mar 2014 05:43 PM |
| WMD's and MAD are the only reason WWIII hasnt yet happened |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Mar 2014 05:45 PM |
If you didn't have Nuclear weapons, there would be alot more conventional Warfare, Nuclear missles haven't killed anyone directly since the Nagasaki Bomb. Nuclear missiles are more of a deterant than a weapon, they will probably never ever be detonated. Think of it this way. Imagine if Germany was about to be Invaded by Russia, But hang on, Germany has Nuclear weapons, Russia is scared to Invade incase Germany Fires it's Nukes, but take the Nukes away from that? Then what happens? Germany is invaded by Russia causes death on a massive scale, |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 08:24 AM |
"If you didn't have Nuclear weapons, there would be alot more conventional Warfare, Nuclear missles haven't killed anyone directly since the Nagasaki Bomb. Nuclear missiles are more of a deterant than a weapon, they will probably never ever be detonated. Think of it this way. Imagine if Germany was about to be Invaded by Russia, But hang on, Germany has Nuclear weapons, Russia is scared to Invade incase Germany Fires it's Nukes, but take the Nukes away from that? Then what happens? Germany is invaded by Russia causes death on a massive scale,"
But the alternative is to photoshop nuclear missles and show them your enemies, like north Korea. South Korea started placing anti-missle missles or however it's called in their cities. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Borowng
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 30500 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 10:37 AM |
| If nukes never existed the Cold War wouldn't of been a Cold War. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 10:50 AM |
"If nukes never existed the Cold War wouldn't of been a Cold War."
Why not? Cold war means no nuclear weapons! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 10:53 AM |
| Actually the cold war existed due to Stalin's paranoia and the propaganda from both sides that we/they had to "combat this evil ideology". |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Borowng
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 30500 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 10:55 AM |
| Okay the Cold War would of existed but there would be no deterrent to stop the world powers from directly attacking each other. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 11:00 AM |
| No evidence for that either: http://www.academia.edu/2945493/Did_nuclear_weapons_bring_the_world_to_the_edge_of_war_or_did_they_help_ensure_the_peace_ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 11:10 AM |
Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime.
- Ernst Hemingway |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 11:36 AM |
But if russia doesn't fall for your Photoshopped missiles, and still invade, how will you deter them then? Nukes are a deterent and a last resort |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 11:39 AM |
| You mean like in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, then ._.? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Riducule
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 3271 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 11:52 AM |
''Why should we have less bombs then Russia''
-Unknown American, 1965
''Workers unite, you have nothing to lose but your chains, and we have nothing to gain but the next generation... Lives'' |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 12:21 PM |
"But if russia doesn't fall for your Photoshopped missiles, and still invade, how will you deter them then? Nukes are a deterent and a last resort"
See? It makes no sense to build nuclear weapons because the enemy still invades your country. A photoshopped missle always work, a good example is South Korea. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 12:32 PM |
Not really, it's really easy to tell the diffrence between a Real Nuclear Missile and a Photoshopped one. The russians would be alot more likely to invade. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 12:35 PM |
| But you can easly manipulate the media to show that you have nuclear weapons. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 12:53 PM |
But you can easly manipulate the media to show that you have nuclear weapons. ------------- Then go manipulate the media to show you have nuclear weapons, if it is so easy go convince the world that you do. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 01:36 PM |
"Then go manipulate the media to show you have nuclear weapons, if it is so easy go convince the world that you do."
How? I have to be a leader of a country first who wants to scare other countries. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 02:29 PM |
How? I have to be a leader of a country first who wants to scare other countries. ----------------- You said it was easy so convince them you built one. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 02:36 PM |
| I said as leader of a country, you wouldn't be able to start a war with another country if you aren't the leader of a country... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 07:58 PM |
Quoting you: "But you can easly manipulate the media to show that you have nuclear weapons"
You said nothing about being leader of a country furthermore Al Queada and the Revolutionary War as well as the French Revolution disagree with you. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Mar 2014 09:06 PM |
I support building them but we should be responsible with them. If a asteroid is crashing down on Earth (and I know that it likely won't be able to destroy it), that is when we may need it if all else fails. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|