|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:19 AM |
And they owned a limited, jj for example. If he's banned he's no longer an owner, correct? He has broken roblox's rules and lost access to his account and items and therefore is no longer an owner. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:20 AM |
| No as in you agree or, no as in I'm wrong? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:20 AM |
| the item goes out of circulation |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:21 AM |
| I know but would they still be considered an owner of the item? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:22 AM |
if they were to be unbanned, they would still have the item
so i would say yes |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:23 AM |
No as in terminated not temp banned |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:24 AM |
| its trapped within the account forever so ya |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:25 AM |
Well no If someone gets macsed and they email roblox, roblox might take the serial of the limited they got macsed out of from a terminated account and give it to them as compensation. It's happened plenty of times before. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:29 AM |
My point being When your account is terminated, you have broken roblox's rules and therefore your account and everything on it including models, places, clothes, and limiteds are no longer yours. So therefore not an owner of anything that was on it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:29 AM |
The reason for this thread http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=127193124 Dealing with more of Lmad's stupidity. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:33 AM |
So by your logic If roblox was banned (Which is basically impossible but lets say he was.) OMG WHO THE HECK RELEASED THESE HATS WOW HE'S A HACKER |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Gaomon94
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 74936 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:35 AM |
You're trying too hard to get someone to say that banned accounts lose everything, which is false.
Terminated accounts DO NOT lose their inventory items or places. The owner of the account never loses their possession of it, they simply lose the ability to use it past the login and deletion screens. The account, and the things it has, still belong to the original owner. Nothing changes, other than the account cannot be fully used.
Terminated accounts will retain their limited items, they can be looked as out of circulation, as another poster suggested. The limiteds the account has don't magically come back into circulation, they're gone for good.
The only way for the inventory to change is via system-wide handouts (gifts for example) or if an account is proven to have scammed people and had its items changed.
To be honest, I don't understand why you're trying so hard to get someone to say that terminated accounts lose their items. As I said before, it's false, and it doesn't change anything. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
tomtomn00
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Apr 2010 |
| Total Posts: 27998 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:42 AM |
>Dealing with more of Lmad's stupidity. You seem to be the one with it, not LMaD.
You're trying too hard to get away without paying. It isn't working, at all. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:44 AM |
2 things
First, Im pretty sure there's a limit to the time you can appeal and proxy has passed that. Is there a limit? If not I'll pay
Second, why waste the money on a previous owner I obviously knew and anyone could find in a second. I was willing to pay someone who tried harder then looking at the sellers as if I obviously didn't do it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Gaomon94
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 22 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 74936 |
|
|
| 03 Mar 2014 01:49 AM |
1. Yes. It has to be within the last three weeks, if I'm not mistaken, in order to appeal a ban or deletion.
2. Considering that terminated accounts cannot be found in the People search and their profiles cannot be accessed, it probably would take a little bit of work to prove that the account existed.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|