|
| 28 Feb 2014 07:43 PM |
| If that player had any limiteds then put those limiteds back on sale. There are some people banned with a Messor (this is an example) and that's a waste. It should be put back on sale for a little bit less than the current price of that limited, and the owner is ROBLOX (or No Owner). This will help circulate limiteds back in the system. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 07:44 PM |
No support when the owner is banned the hat is that much more valuable limited for a reason |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
3Dwolf11
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 5904 |
|
| |
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 07:45 PM |
Example: I get terminated (not a surprise) - My Messor is still on my account not circulated (that's not good) - (let's say) Messor is 100,000 ROBUX now, once it's circulated it'll be 5,000 less (or whatever ROBLOX decides) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 07:47 PM |
| @Side, besides that, it would be nice to get it back in the circulation. Who cares if it's more rare? It's stupid because that limited could be of use in a none terminated player's inventory instead of not in use at all. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 07:52 PM |
| Support! This means jaredvaldez is no longer wearing Wanwood Antlers! :D |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 07:53 PM |
No support. What if the banned user doesn't want their limiteds on sale?
What's my Siggy again? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 07:54 PM |
| @rave, exactly... He had literally (what, four - five?) accounts with Wanwood Antlers. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 07:54 PM |
| @Dan, he's terminated... Why does that matter? LOL |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 07:55 PM |
| I want magicdsi's Valkyrie Helm and I want jaredvaldez4's Antlers! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
solman123
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Oct 2008 |
| Total Posts: 7282 |
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 08:48 PM |
Ehhhh no. This is a problem. Recently, ROBLOX made it so when a group owner is terminated, the group is free for all. This gave many users reasons to make alts and ban others. Think about the consequences. I could alt-ban a Dominus owner, to get it.
One Shot, One Kill, No Luck, Pure Skill- Damnit, I missed again. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 08:52 PM |
| That doesn't make any sense at all... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 08:56 PM |
No If items leave the game its good It makes items like wwa worth what it it and many other old limiteds |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 08:58 PM |
| @Legend, not really, someone can just take another... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Feb 2014 09:00 PM |
| Well i support. This would help collecters have less frustration trying to get all the hats/gear/etc since a limited would never become nonexistant(which all collecters hate). Also it might be interesting if offsale stuff was able to be raffled off when a account with them is terminated. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 01 Mar 2014 04:57 PM |
| Support my main died with 300k worth of limited |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Mar 2014 05:02 PM |
| Wow, XD. How does that feel? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Mar 2014 05:02 PM |
idea: For appeals, if a user does an appeal within a month, they can keep the limited, but if the appeal is denied, the limited goes on sale. After a month, the item goes on sale. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Mar 2014 05:06 PM |
| Guys... This is if the player is TERMINATED, not banned. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Mar 2014 05:35 PM |
| Wait no support if a frig user is termed then it will be selling for original price? Nah |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|