|
| 25 Feb 2014 11:12 PM |
"Article 25. If there is a vacancy in the post of Prime Minister, the Emperor has ten (10) days from the day the resignation of the former Prime Minister took effect to appoint a new one before the National Diet is tasked with assigning a new one. This new Prime Minister must still be approved by the Emperor and a majority of both houses."
so technically it would be possible for Japan to function without a Prime Minister
which reminds me that I should write an article that describes what to do if the government is left without a Prime Minister (which could easily apply for something such as a leave of absence.)
i should also draft a chain of command if the Prime Minister is unable to preform his duties
dive turn work |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Feb 2014 11:17 PM |
Fair, good job
#inb4namaste2014 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Feb 2014 11:20 PM |
also is this a bit too much?
"he Emperor has the right to invalidate any portion of this constitution at anytime without prior consent of the National Diet or the Prime Minister."
dive turn work |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Synapsic
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1388 |
|
|
| 26 Feb 2014 03:30 PM |
| Idk. Maybe the emperor can invalidate it for up to a week until the National Council and PM have to decide, because permanently invalidating it could result in corruption in future emperors. (You, of course, are not corrupt, but a future emperor could take advantage of that.) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Feb 2014 03:31 PM |
Emperors are unconstitutional because the United States Constitution says so.
Fix it.
~R |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 26 Feb 2014 03:45 PM |
"Emperors are unconstitutional because the United States Constitution says so."
no?
dive turn work |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|