| |
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 06:24 PM |
| Nuclear waste makes it less worth it, though it's still better than fossil fuels. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 06:48 PM |
| Cheap, risky and it lefts dangerous garbage. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 07:04 PM |
| nuclear weapons are awesome |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dulexo
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 32755 |
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 08:13 PM |
clean energy safer than coal k
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 08:17 PM |
| Dulexo, it's not clean. It lefts garbage |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dulexo
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 32755 |
|
| |
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 08:19 PM |
| The garbage is a liquid that can reach the ground water...it can pollute the water. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dulexo
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 32755 |
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 08:21 PM |
| it never has and it never will |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cazamal
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1256 |
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 08:23 PM |
Dul is correct.
Nuclear waste cannot seap through it's containers.
They know what they're doing. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dulexo
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 32755 |
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 08:25 PM |
nuclear power plants these days have systems now a'days to shutdown most of their cores if a disaster were to happen and only way anything from a nuke plant could come out is a disaster nuclear is the safest and most efficent way of making energy.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cazamal
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1256 |
|
|
| 15 Feb 2014 08:26 PM |
Nah.
The safest is solar energy.
But solar energy which we can all agree on,
is the most inefficent crap. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
0Z0NE
|
  |
| Joined: 25 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 7951 |
|
| |
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 04:36 AM |
"Dul is correct.
Nuclear waste cannot seap through it's containers.
They know what they're doing."
No, they just throw them in abandoned mines, the containers can break and the liquid can get in the ground water.
Do you think they store them in safe storage rooms? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 05:05 AM |
2013, They, do infact store them in safe storage rooms. Noone is stupid enough to put them in an Abandoned mine. Also, there is a new type of Wind turbine that creates 6 time's as much energy, thats the safest and most efficient way to get power |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 05:34 AM |
"2013, They, do infact store them in safe storage rooms. Noone is stupid enough to put them in an Abandoned mine. Also, there is a new type of Wind turbine that creates 6 time's as much energy, thats the safest and most efficient way to get power"
My country does... they choose abandoned salt-mines and they throw the containers in the mines... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dulexo
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 32755 |
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 07:06 AM |
>No, they just throw them in abandoned mines, the containers can break and the liquid can get in the ground water.
Do you think they store them in safe storage rooms?
...that is the absolutely stupidest argument in the world. try again.
>My country does... they choose abandoned salt-mines and they throw the containers in the mines...
hahahahahahahahahah
in finland we have no smog, no polution, we deal with the waste properly.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
re567
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4550 |
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 07:07 AM |
Ban Nuclear Power. It causes serious mutations, and problems.
Switch to Solar, Hydro-Electric, and Wind! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dulexo
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 32755 |
|
| |
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 07:11 AM |
| Dulexo, please be serious. Nuclear power is a serious topic. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dulexo
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 32755 |
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 07:12 AM |
i like how the commie tries to have an opinion when he supports a country that didnt allow opinions irl lul |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
re567
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4550 |
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 07:15 AM |
| Dulex, stop it. Political Bullying is stupid. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dulexo
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 32755 |
|
| |
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 07:17 AM |
| Dulexo, please take our opinions about nuclear power serious and don't forget the disaster in Japan and Russia (names are censored) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Dulexo
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2015 |
| Total Posts: 32755 |
|
|
| 16 Feb 2014 07:22 AM |
I'm glad you read the rules.
There has not been 1 record of a nuclear powerplant having anykind of problem, unless something happened, such as what happened in 2011, a tsunami hit the plant.
A disaster like that is the only way of any possible problem with plants. Remember, there's been no records of any other way, of anything happening. This is the same with power plants, like coal, or gas. Except they are more likely to have a problem [even if it's not a disaster] because, one idiot lights a cig, whole place goes boom, and if a gas plant has an explosion, it can destroy a whole city, there was a somekind of plant in America, which blew up, people a mile away had 2nd degree burns. And that's with the fire department.
And most gas plants, have large pipelines of oil, and have you seen what happens to oil? Oil only starts to boil/burn at a high tempeture, which gas can provide. Nuke plants, have no such danger, only danger is radiation, which most plants which have high date technology have systems to stop something from happening, plus cores are starting to be stored underground, which is literally impossible to breach unless you nuke it [with a nuke]
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|