Sasook
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 41122 |
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:32 AM |
well yeah 25 vs 5 isnt very fun
but no i mean lag wise |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
xTia98x
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5022 |
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:32 AM |
@Outlaw
*Facepalm
You are not getting what I am hinting at. ;/ Okay nvm. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sasook
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 41122 |
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:33 AM |
but imo the best part about this is how USF used to be based on skill but now you're complaining about server sizes because your members are sub par raiders
it was 11 vs 5 and your people kept leaving and more RAA got in. i dont think you can blame the server size for that? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:34 AM |
@Sasook
So you're admitting that RAA can only get 5 to a raid..? And also "lag wise" so is lag your excuse too now? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sasook
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 41122 |
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:35 AM |
no but a 30 person server would allow server floods which would then allow just the right amount of raiders to leak in. thats how it works
and yes lag is a part of clan bases and interferes with gameplay. pretty legit excuse if i say so myself |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Outlaw001
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 35333 |
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:35 AM |
"could take on a whole server ;p"
fine is this more precise and accurate |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Neovus
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Oct 2013 |
| Total Posts: 15145 |
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:37 AM |
Cutting a base down below 30 members for gameplay and lag purposes is a valid reason. He also didn't say RAA can only get 5 members to a raid, he said only 5 could fit into your server and as others left more RAA got in.
I don't advocate for the flame RAA does because personally it's none of my business how he runs his clan, but if you're going to send me PMs provoking the logic in why I think RAA is good, the least you could do is provoke logic here in your arguments against Sasook. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:37 AM |
| Sasook I'm not going to argue anymore about it, I'm just saying if you put the server to 30 you wouldn't win a raid. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Sasook
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2009 |
| Total Posts: 41122 |
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:39 AM |
well if the clan server floods we are obligated to defend. of course we would lose. the guns at coventry are designed for teamwork not for 25 vs 5 matches
i dont think thats relevant to USF's inability to win tough raids though |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
xTia98x
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5022 |
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:41 AM |
| Well, Sasook still can't count. And, likes to throw insults. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
xTia98x
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5022 |
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:43 AM |
@Paul
Might go on my SL0 account. I am bored and want to try some scripts. ;/ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:43 AM |
@Neo
Actually, I don't expect sasook to answer me with a mature answer. I just expect him to use some of that "comical genius" you were talking about...
Sasook isn't the kind of person you can actually dispute with, even when he knows he is wrong, he'll still continue to be illogical about it.
@Sasook
Well whatever you say. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Feb 2014 12:45 AM |
@Neo
I also know he wasn't saying that RAA could only get 5 into the server. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|