|
| 20 Jan 2014 08:03 PM |
| Personally, I'm all for this. What are your thoughts, opinions, etc? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Midmyst
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Nov 2009 |
| Total Posts: 4803 |
|
|
| 20 Jan 2014 08:04 PM |
| I'm hoping you would replace it with a multi-party (3 or more) system and not with a single party state. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
JamesGalt
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Sep 2007 |
| Total Posts: 13607 |
|
|
| 20 Jan 2014 08:08 PM |
| Two party system is better. In the US, the two parties are big tents as they are already. If you want more than small amount of things that get done in a two-party system, good luck getting that in a multi-party one. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Jan 2014 08:23 PM |
The abolition of political parties would be preposterous in the face of the (diminishing) natural monopoly that is the national election.
However, changing federal election rules, congressional caucusing, and primary registration would encourage the development of more parties. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Jan 2014 08:29 PM |
| Wouldn't that create a lot of goalpost moving @MahPizza? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 20 Jan 2014 08:37 PM |
| Oh, I was thinking more of the lines on how the Democrats supposively changed rules to pass the ACA. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 20 Jan 2014 10:25 PM |
| You want multiple parties? If only we even had 2. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|