|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:28 AM |
Read before you through your bias opinions.
Vaktovia and Arcadia BOTH broke war terms, don't complain about the other side doing it if you did too!
1. -Vaktovia updated their base, but not updating it with all these cruddy ROBLOX updates will break stuff, and most the stuff added helped both sides, like the hallways, if raiders got inside they could secure it easily.
-Arcadia broke this war term by bringing in a whole new base. Stronghold II went to New Alexandria, breaking the war term more. They try to dodge this saying "It's not an update though, it's a different base". Which is an update, because it's basically new everything, then they broke it again by going back to Stronghold II.
Arcadians complain about VAK changing their base to the better for them, but they changed to New Alexandria which is alot more unfair and easy for them to win at, but they changed back to SH II. You can't use the excuse "Well we changed it back." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Arcadia and Vaktovia had a meeting about the rules. They came up with these war terms together. The Grand Imperium pulled out due to "unfairness" but that is still pulling out of the war. You ended it, and now you're giving VAK a "chance" for a final battle, and that's breaking another war term, as it says "NO FINAL BATTLE." TGI has shifted so many things since the war began. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Grand Imperium, the first day they were up about 17-1, then they started bragging it, Vaktovia says "Doesn't matter because it's an endurance war" TGI says "We're winning the war" when VAK keeps explaining "It's an endurance war".
But when Vaktovia comes back they do the same thing Vaktovia did. Vaktovias war score ended up 51-34, Arcadians complain about how unfair it is, yet they kept winning there.
TGI is only happy when they win, if they don't win they start complaining about unfairness, but when they do they say it's fine. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Arcadia tried to pull off Vaktovia broke another war term by using VAC. They say "VACs don't count as real Vaktovians until in the empire, so that's using allies." That is probably the dumbest thing I ever heard. I know TAG counts as Arcadians, but you guys accepted basically every ally to join the group, so they could help fight, I know you won't just deny everybody, but then you started just accepting allies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. That is why I think Vaktovia won. Please read before you throw stuff out. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
RacerM3
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Sep 2011 |
| Total Posts: 2939 |
|
| |
|
PappyJR99
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 33740 |
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:33 AM |
Support
All I'm going to say. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
govand554
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1701 |
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:33 AM |
| you're so legit, good sir. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:37 AM |
this makes sense
inb4ragingTGI |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
PappyJR99
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 33740 |
|
| |
|
Indicize
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1373 |
|
| |
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:41 AM |
| You are one of few people with a brain. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mitsu1000
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1424 |
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:41 AM |
Taken from the official pastebin of the discussion on the war terms. "3:17 PM - ¤ Ꮴaĸτυѕ ♛ Ꭲhe Ꭰark Ꮮord ¤: Very well. Next point is to ensure this war is kept fair on both sides. Neither side can modify their bases to a ridiculous extend, for example, us adding an instant-killing minigun for Generals, or you adding an indestructable super-tank of some kind. This would also apply to things such as how long the base must be held, so no terminals that have to be held for 6 hours, or take 60 seconds to capture for raiders, but instant recapture for defenders. Agreed? 3:18 PM - ¤ Ꮴaĸτυѕ ♛ Ꭲhe Ꭰark Ꮮord ¤: As well to that point that I forgot to add, is that there would be no "Raid must be under 60 minutes or you instantly fail" scripts at either side's bases. 3:18 PM - [DELARGIVIC] ToberDam: Before I agree, is it confirmed that the updated version of SMO will be using balanced weapons (I believe RCL) at their regular state? I believe there was a lot of complaints about the weapons (Never bothered to investigate, due to respecting my own declaration from months before)"
Doesn't say anywhere how you're not allowed to update the base to move a brick 1 stud to the left instead of letting it as it is. So to that point I call BS, as the terms say how you're not allowed to update to make it unfair.
I'm not going to bother with the rest of the post. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
PappyJR99
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 33740 |
|
| |
|
sovietz
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 13554 |
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:43 AM |
forget shots olympus has fallen |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:44 AM |
Shots fired And ricochet
{Phail with a PH} sloths r lov sloths r lif |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
mitsu1000
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1424 |
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:46 AM |
I do respect your opinion tho.
At least you didn't use Google translate and you tried to bring some points to support yourself. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:47 AM |
this
CRACK A BOTTLE - add 3k to my post count |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:48 AM |
TAG/TGI know this is true.
They won't come on here, I'll bump it until Vaktus makes his own statement. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
govand554
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1701 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
PappyJR99
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 33740 |
|
| |
|
|
| 28 Dec 2013 10:50 AM |
@ Hyper
Actually, more than half the people that supported this aren't in VAc/VAK.
Even an FC agreed, call this bias then. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
willrox45
|
  |
| Joined: 30 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 835 |
|
| |
|
Bab0
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 246 |
|
| |
|