|
| 29 Dec 2013 10:54 AM |
Because we all know how once rules are implemented everyone abides by them and no one opposes the concept of the terms.
[-[★-]Blue will prevail~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Enzo01234
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6131 |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 10:55 AM |
if only
+1038 posts | Joined October 2010 ~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Cirvius
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 18817 |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 10:55 AM |
| Honestly, I think you should be in The C&G Council. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 10:55 AM |
look at the superclan rule
people will follow something if it makes logical sense |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 10:56 AM |
People have been arguing the amount of members that formally consider a clan to be a superclan for years. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 10:58 AM |
no they haven't
maybe YOU disagree with it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:00 AM |
Sure they have. Once the rise of all the VIP clans people wanted to raise the amount of members to be considered a superclan to eliminate or at least prevent VIP clans to be considered a superclan. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
squidboi2
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Apr 2009 |
| Total Posts: 52336 |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:03 AM |
'no they haven't'
oh yes they have. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:06 AM |
so far, i've never seen any controversy over what classifies as a superclan since VIP clans such as rebel squad and team domino came into the fray
even then, the arguments died down |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
govand554
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Dec 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1701 |
|
| |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:07 AM |
You are contradicting your prior statement. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:08 AM |
no i'm not
i'm simply stating there has never been a true meaningful argument regarding the definition of "superclan"
a few hours of arguing how many members classifies as one is not a "meaningful argument" |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:08 AM |
| Twinkie, it is just that for the past 2-3 years, clan leaders grown more greedy, more cheeky, in wanting to win, trying to be big shots, many of us want change. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
kaelan01
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2008 |
| Total Posts: 21444 |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:11 AM |
"i'm simply stating there has never been a true meaningful argument regarding the definition of "superclan""
superclans are big clans
that's the definition of a superclan |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:11 AM |
You stated before that "no one has been" arguing against the superclan rule yet you provided an example of when individuals opposed it.
@Sal; Regulation is not going to prevent greed, arrogant individuals and desires here.
[-[★-]Blue will prevail~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:13 AM |
@twinkie
and as I just said, that is not a true argument and just a couple of hours arguing a point across
if someone actually completely challenged and revoked the meaning of "superclan" then it would be considered an argument |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:15 AM |
People lead clans to ultimately do what they want and shape a community to their ideals. If their ideals don't coincide with the implemented regulation, they're not going to abide.
[-[★-]Blue will prevail~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:17 AM |
"and as I just said, that is not a true argument and just a couple of hours arguing a point across"
Sure it was a true arguments, much of C&G regretted that these new clans were exponentially increasing the amount of members by gameplay or VIP passes. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lazia
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 11153 |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:17 AM |
I already made clans rules and guildlines like any one followed them... No one will follow rules
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Distante
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Oct 2013 |
| Total Posts: 10014 |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:18 AM |
| no matter how many people agree with these "set of rules", chances are no leader would agree with them anyways. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:20 AM |
@twinkie
**if someone actually completely challenged and revoked the meaning of "superclan" then it would be considered an argument** |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:23 AM |
Opposing another argument providing reasons is consider an argument. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:24 AM |
| there was never someone that did that |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lazia
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Apr 2012 |
| Total Posts: 11153 |
|
|
| 29 Dec 2013 11:31 AM |
Rules should be set tho .... We really need them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|