|
| 09 Feb 2013 02:42 PM |
Decal uploading needs to be improved.
Firstly: We can upload multiple images at a time
Secondly: It clearly displays the maximum resolution of uploaded images, beyond which they are reduced.
Thirdly: If an image is smaller than the maximum resolution, it is not stretched but remains in its current size (So small images are not blurred)
Fourthly: A checkbox is added to determine if a decal is smoothed (blurred) upon reduction
Lastly: A BC user can pay some robux to upload an image in a higher resolution. Resolutions: Up to and including 256x256 (Standard, free) Up to and including 512x512 (20R$) Up to and including 1024x1024 (50R$) Up to and including 2048x2048 (150R$, thats 1 pixel/stud on the largest brick size) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 09 Feb 2013 03:54 PM |
| For !!HIGH RESOLUTION NON-BLURRY IMAGES!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 10 Feb 2013 06:41 PM |
Support, but why charge a fee at all unless it was over 1024 x 1024? I agree on a SMALL fee for bigger images to stop people from making a place just to lag you or big very big and have something bypassing the image mods.
Current Goal: JJ5x5 + Void* by 3/21/13 {K}Kīñg300000{K} #epicfaceforfree |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Feb 2013 09:36 AM |
Because space is money, and money is what makes the fake world go round.
In reality, its kittens. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
SPIRITnU
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1875 |
|
| |
|
|
| 11 Feb 2013 10:20 AM |
| This is a bad idea, except that I get to pay robux! Yes, that was sarcasm. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 11 Feb 2013 02:38 PM |
| We need this implemented last Tuesday! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Encreyl
|
  |
| Joined: 16 Mar 2012 |
| Total Posts: 558 |
|
|
| 12 Feb 2013 11:04 AM |
| Yes, this is indeed important stuff. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Nick24r7
|
  |
| Joined: 13 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4434 |
|
| |
|
Quorum
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4680 |
|
|
| 27 Dec 2013 10:38 AM |
Surprisingly I support them all. However, I am a bit iffy on the last one however...
1) To circumvent the 20R$ fee, a BC member could easily upload a shirt. Which provides a higher resolution than 512x512, and it wouldn't cost them a dime. 2) The prices, past 512, could possibly be a little steeper, considering that the higher the resolution, the longer it could take for some lower end PCs to load (and those who may have slow internet). Therefore ROBLOX would want to throttle the amount of the much higher resolution images that are uploaded.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
vlekje513
|
  |
| Joined: 28 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 9057 |
|
| |
|