WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:16 PM |
> Joins server mainly dominated by RoC and several NFC's as raiders.
> Witness 6 HAU's defending the place, one of which was Practice who had said that the raid was perfectly legitimate.
> At about 500 seconds, I'm killed on several instances without even seeing my enemy. Practice claims it to be due to lag, though I have my suspicions, I go along with it.
> Practice leaves the server to go eat dinner, wishes HAU good luck on the raid.
> Bunch of claims by several HAU members that the raid is unofficially as the numbers of defenders significantly decrease.
> Admin joins server, initializes several kicks and a ban. Lots of claims about AA, though they die out very quickly.
> Timer hits 1000 seconds. I witness several RoC's being teleported to armed HAU members and begin to record for evidence. I encourage others to record as I'm teleported myself.
> Several minutes after I capture a teleportation. I claim AA, and instantly die -- right at the spawn while FF'd.
> I urge the raiders to fight on, telling them that just in case I have compelling evidence to HAU's abuse.
> Server shuts down. My game crashes, and I am still frozen within the HAU server. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:17 PM |
| The great WannaBet has spoken. And he is correct. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:19 PM |
I believe that WB was recording, here is the proof of practice spawnkilling though. Not to mention shutting down the server (the disconnect)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqZlSKXFWs4 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:20 PM |
Already saw that. That's when he shut down the 3rd NFC server for serverhopping.
I'm talking about this post. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:22 PM |
| So now serverhopping is illegal? We would have won the EL war without a fight. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Modster1
|
  |
| Joined: 04 May 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1291 |
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:22 PM |
| I miss RoC when you owned it, best times I ever had. qq |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:23 PM |
| If a full server of people and a handful of raiders pointing out to an abusive circumstance all at the same time isn't evidence to you, then you're an unreasonable person. There is no hope in proving anything to you. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:23 PM |
Check the handbook. Pretty sure that it's an old post. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:25 PM |
"====5. DIAMOND OUTPOST 2 RULES - THESE RULES MUST BE OBEYED or you're at subject of being kicked. - There must be AT LEAST 6 HAU members there before a raid begins. YOU CAN wait for them to show up. - KEEP ALL FLAMING to a minimum. OCCASIONALLY, YOU WILL BE ALLOWED TO FLAME. - NO EXPLOITING IS ALLOWED. - THERE IS NO ADMIN ABUSE. - THERE ARE NO AUTOWINS. - ONCE A SERVER HAS BEEN WON, you cannot "hop" back to that server. - No pre-server flooding. We can't enter if there's 20/20 of you. There must be AT LEAST 6 spots open."
I am tracking these rules, of course. However, can someone please refer me to the rules for the war overall (forum thread, etc.)? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
WannaBet
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jan 2011 |
| Total Posts: 23607 |
|
|
| 13 Dec 2013 07:29 PM |
@Brick // Handbook regulations.
I'd like to specifically look at rule number 3 - "There must be AT LEAST 6 HAU members there before a raid begins. YOU CAN wait for them to show up."
Rule number 3 specifies a circumstance in which a raid is officially INITIALIZED, it says nothing about halting the server in case the defenders decide to retreat in the middle of a legitimate round. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|