|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:17 PM |
A great leader if you did not include "THe Final Solution" part of it. I understand that is hard to do, but try it, he would have been viewed like Napoleon, where even though he lost he was great nonetheless
Now obviously with "The Final Solution" he ruined his chances of ever being viewed as a good leader, and is terrible for that, but think about what his rep would be without TFS |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:18 PM |
get out now you scrub we don't want you kind here
add 1k to my post count| Never forget OTermination Day |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Skellor
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 66606 |
|
| |
|
Timezones
|
  |
| Joined: 27 May 2011 |
| Total Posts: 7141 |
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:19 PM |
On a serious note: The N-to-the-zs were somewhat more technologically advanced than us back then.
Not like it really matter now though... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
applekk
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 18171 |
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:20 PM |
| obviously in the N4z1's veiw |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:20 PM |
| well, he was a good leader in the sense that he got so many people to follow his views so efficiently. he was a bad person with bad views, though. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:22 PM |
Ok, let's completely forget the war crimes he commited for a moment, and instead just look at the man.
He was a strategic genius, one of the best speakers of his time, and by far one of the most hated men by his enemies. He not only rallied Germany and almost single-handedly saved the world from the recession, he created an incredible secret agreement with Russia and had a wonderful original world-domination plan. If the attack on Russia and Stalingrad wouldn't have happened, I honestly believe there would be more people speaking German today. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
ScoutBob
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Oct 2011 |
| Total Posts: 613 |
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:24 PM |
| Regardless, he would have aged to d3@th by now. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:25 PM |
@Blox
Read the rest of the post. I did bring that up. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:26 PM |
| No Russia still would've won. Stalingrad or not, there was still South East Russia. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:26 PM |
| well yeah maybe but it's a little hard to ignore |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Dec 2013 04:27 PM |
I'm saying, if they kept the agreement and most of Europe was conquered.
Of course, in that time, Russia would probably be building a major attack force, and America would have been fighting them off, too. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|