|
| 25 Nov 2013 06:59 PM |
We have wars so that we get oil so that you can keep on living your life without needing to hunt for your food and fend for yourself in a hypothetically third world USA.
That said, if you are still anti war you should imagine your life without anything you know except for your body, no electricity, no secured source of food or safe water, and no cops to keep you safe from the many people stronger than you.
Idiots. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:05 PM |
"We have wars so that we get oil"
You mean steal oil? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:07 PM |
@blocker
Who cares?
Would you rather be nice and share your oil and subsequently raise prices so high that cars stopped being used, or actually be smart and use the oil to your advantage so that you can have a good life?
If you picked the former then please pack up a set of clothes and possibly a weapon and move to somalia. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:16 PM |
| I'm pretty sure the people we stole it from care. I don't think having oil would mean your life will be good. If I was to steal all of the oil, or just enough, then wouldn't I possibly ruin the lives of others. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:27 PM |
@tariq
no! bad goy!
kill the gentile! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:32 PM |
| The third world is the USA? Well apparently you need to steal oil in order to survive in the states ._. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:33 PM |
@omnon
>hypothetical
You should know what this word means. Re-read my post after learning its definition, |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:34 PM |
| Still how is it "hypothetically" the third world? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:34 PM |
@omnom
No oil = no power = no factories = no farms = no food = no protection forces = no safety = third world |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:35 PM |
| So.. the USA is suddenly running out of oil? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:38 PM |
Jesus christ.
I said hypothetically if we didn't fight for oil. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:39 PM |
I did some research and it seems that the country is kind of turning into the third world economy.
Let the hunger games begin? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:54 PM |
| You're justifying the mass killing of thousands of people? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 07:57 PM |
@super
It's the death of a thousand or the poverty and suffering of hundreds of millions |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 08:07 PM |
| How exactly does massacring thousands of people help the population? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 08:42 PM |
>people
You mean terrorists who threaten our supply of oil? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 08:48 PM |
| You mean their supply of oil? And we weren't fighting terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan doesn't have oil |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 09:03 PM |
@super
Let me explain this although you probably wont understant
Terrorists near Saudi Arabia's oil = bad
Why?
They destroy it because they know we depend on it, so to keep the terrorists from blowing up the fields, we go to war with them, got it?
And then, we do not steal it, we sign defense contracts and pay up for the oil to make sure it gets back to you for gas, plastics, and about every electronic item you own. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 09:14 PM |
| I searched on Google and there has never been an incident of terrorists destroying oil |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 10:20 PM |
The US bought oil from the mujadien Plus we have so much oil in the states thanks to hippies we dont exploit it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
stomache
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Aug 2012 |
| Total Posts: 8688 |
|
| |
|
Drynoa
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Jan 2010 |
| Total Posts: 338 |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2013 07:16 AM |
| Architect is a idiot, he thinks we can only live currently because of oil, hell we'd be better of without cars, we got coal, natural farms, hell nuclear energy, I don't get what the hell he's doing but I'm pretty sure he's trolling. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
2013Yay
|
  |
| Joined: 31 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 5299 |
|
|
| 26 Nov 2013 09:23 AM |
| No war would be better! You don't have to pay for an army, that means you don't have to steal oil. There is a country without an army and they have no problems with their defence, they just have no war. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 26 Nov 2013 10:01 AM |
@dry
That is the most stupid thing I have seen all day.
Do you even understand basic economics?
"We'd be better off without cars"
Are your seriously implying that removing the single most important/productive method of transportation that we'd be better off?
And protip: Nuclear energy as it stands is also reliant upon a steady supply of oil for gaskets, turbines, electronics, etc. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|