| |
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 06:33 PM |
No...........
I don't know why this is needed...RBX.Lua is just fine. And by taking a look at it. This looks Worse to use than Lua... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 06:37 PM |
I doubt that you can develop a language equivalent to Lua. Not to mention better.
Also I bet the BERL compiler is horrible...
I don't care how many "functions" you put into this language. Lua is still better. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 06:42 PM |
I don't see how your Language is simpler? var bob 7 bob = 7
The Lua is much cleaner not to mention SIMPLER. Also it says this when you create a cvar.
"//Pushed NAME into VALUE"
I am pretty sure that is backwards...
You would be allocating memory for the value and then that NAME refers to that value. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 06:46 PM |
| One more thing. You language is version 1.0 and all you can do is make a variable...And print stuff... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 06:47 PM |
The print function cannot print variables.
And before you add any functions. ADD CONTROL STRUCTURES |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
UnAdmin
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4706 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
RaidenJPN
|
  |
| Joined: 22 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 6920 |
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 07:22 PM |
I decided to test out your 'BERLL',
and inputted a simple basic addition function and got errors such as:
No function named function (Are you serious right now)?
No function named return (I lost all faith in your language right here. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
UnAdmin
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Jul 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4706 |
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 07:23 PM |
| Learning syntax for normal RBX lua would be easier than learning syntax for this. Why don't you make some normal Lua to c++ thing so people can learn c++ easier? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 07:26 PM |
| Moonscript accomplishes this in a better fashion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
RaidenJPN
|
  |
| Joined: 22 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 6920 |
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 07:50 PM |
>there's like 7 functions
Well wouldn't at least 'function' be one of them,
it's one of the most important of functions. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 07:58 PM |
Alright. At least your syntax is better than this: pastebin/nM03W2Ug
It's a little something something I'm working on. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 08:01 PM |
"better ~= simpler" No, but if you want people to use "BERLL" over RBX.Lua you want it to be better, not to mention simplicity is a factor of making something better than another.
"which is why it's 1.0 BETA" Beta is not even good enough. Personally, I'd version this 0.1.1d (dev), just to make it more clear.
"there's like 7 functions" Then make more, he's basically giving you suggestions right there.
"except moonscript's not directed towards RBX.Lua, as mine will be" >Moonscript accomplishes this in a better fashion >Moonscript > this (crap) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 08:15 PM |
"I doubt that you can develop a language equivalent to Lua. Not to mention better." "Not to mention better." Learn Assembly (NASM Syntax). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 24 Nov 2013 08:27 PM |
I'm actually pretty happy somebody is making this.
New scripters need to find a very easy way to learn, and I'm hoping your BERLL will be that one step furthur to helping newbies script.
Good luck man! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
jobro13
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Aug 2009 |
| Total Posts: 2865 |
|
|
| 25 Nov 2013 08:35 AM |
Why?
This will make it even harder for users to use "normal Lua".
Besides, looking at your syntax, I'd say it's harder than normal Lua. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|