8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:36 PM |
RAA should count that as a forfeit i mean it isn't even like TGI is a challenge that much anymore RAA could easily beat them and VAK and TGI aren't exactly at war i haven't heard of either side raiding so why decline RAA sure they troll on forums but that doesn't mean they are bad necessarily because RAA is a very good group you all or some of you take RAA as a joke but they're easily in the top 10 list of best clans. plus if you notice he has been telling his members no more trolling on c&g daily in the shout and punishing ones that do [ i think ] you should accept RAA because they'd be a challenge not so much that they'd win though who knows they might but seriously why just use the excuse "we are at war with tgi atm" or "cant because on tgi can raid" but i don't see any tGI even raiding what's up with that
please elaborate why you won't let RAA declare war and no i'm not trying to flame either side i just don't get it scrows is only looking for a group that'll pose as a challenge due to WIJ basically laughing and declining and not raiding back please someone elaborate and i'll be ignoring all flame.
bulq is life |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
| |
|
Cryptios
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2725 |
|
| |
|
8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:40 PM |
if it's that big of a problem VAK should upload SMO again only for anyone to raid rather than just tgi because i don't see tgi raiding
bulq is life |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:41 PM |
or maybe is VAK scared RAA actually stands a chance and doesn't want to tarnish their never lost rep?
bulq is life |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:43 PM |
someone maybe typing a long word wall of nothingness trying to prove it wrong?
bulq is life |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
| |
|
8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
| |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:48 PM |
VAK has lost a war before, Acting Emperor Dologan and Vaktus won't admit it, though.
They admitted defeat @ MB.
[~] - NeoDaranzia - [~]
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:48 PM |
lol raa, I might rejoin
Peas and Lols |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
| |
|
sadcamp2
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1090 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:49 PM |
i'm not sure how we can back down from a war by dissing someone.
hell, that wasn't even the slightest near a war deceleration.
that was meant to a joke. people took it ever so serious.
rock & dubstep is lyfe |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
solong66
|
  |
| Joined: 27 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5245 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:50 PM |
"Emperor Dologan"
THIS GUY TOTALLY KNOWS HIS INFORMATION. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:51 PM |
considering that RAA wasn't joking and you guys basically declined
also support |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
| |
|
8149
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Nov 2013 |
| Total Posts: 456 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 03:54 PM |
nobody is even explaining all of you are just trying to make excuses or pick out others mistakes
im not looking for a flame war just a logical explanation on why VAK declined RAA's war declaration
bulq is life |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
sadcamp2
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1090 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 04:03 PM |
Lets make some terminology here.
Scrows makes a ridiculous thread, not big surprise, saying "RAA Declares war on VAK, same reasons as WIJ, but maybe they'll actually fight"
Pretty sure it was made as a joke.
But to those in illuminati who want an answer for everything and believe the opposite of everything,
I believe there is perfect reasoning in why we are CURRENTLY declining it. It's nothing to be ashamed of, as some people may list it as shame to Vaktovia.
RAA currently has a horrid. I mean... Horrid public appearance. It's not deniable. Neither can I deny they are good fighters. (i didn't say great, just good)
Even Ed (gh) mentions, "Perhaps once you have unearthed your head from your arses, you will realise what a ridiculous fool you have made of yourself writing this thread."
What he was saying here, is that he makes it known to Scrows that he has made himself a discriminate to all of C&G and the clan world.
Lets not forget what he says directly before that: "As it stands, R.A.A does not pose of any significance to Vaktovia."
I'm more than hell of sure that everyone knows that RAA shows no threat, nor significance to us. If we were to accept it, it would simply be at the most, a random war, as we are not fighting for really anything, they just wish to test our patience and abilities. A war which would be significant in clan history was the war for the top. TGI vs VAK, of-course. The significance in this war is that we are/were at eachothers necks on who was the best, and VAK seems to have the upper hand right now. This war basically proves which one is the true top. With RAA, it would not make any difference, unless RAA somehow pulls a hat-trick and actually wins the damn war. WHICH I FIND THE CHANCES OF THAT HAPPENING VERY BLEAK.
Another reason on why Ed (gh) declined the war was because of the current war. We are in no position ready for another war as we are currently fighting one against TGI right now. As mentioned in the declination: "Feel free to raid as you please, though there will be trouble doing that at the moment because of our conflict with TGI."
Good enough?
rock & dubstep is lyfe |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 04:07 PM |
| woah there sadcamp looks like you put a lot of effort into that paragraph of excuses |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
sadcamp2
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1090 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 04:09 PM |
Paragraphs are simple when you have the power of typing 70 WPM.
rock & dubstep is lyfe |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 04:09 PM |
| as far as i'm concerned, vak would want worthy and respectable opponents, not childish ego boosters. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 04:09 PM |
@ Solong
Look at what I said:
"ACTING Emperor Dologan"
Vaktus is never online anymore.
[~] - NeoDaranzia - [~] |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 04:10 PM |
Actually VAK technically HAS lost to MB.
oɹq pɐɯ noʎ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
sadcamp2
|
  |
| Joined: 17 Nov 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1090 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 04:10 PM |
@SirOutlaw
That is exactly what I was trying to get through in my "paragraph of excuses"
rock & dubstep is lyfe |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
solong66
|
  |
| Joined: 27 May 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5245 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 04:11 PM |
No, you clearly don't know your information.
Idiot. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|