|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:26 PM |
Some of you may have seen this forum post that I've made (Specifically Quorum): http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=118515681
Well, scratch that idea. It turns out that I'm not seeing things by posting it that way.
What I do have for an idea though is an Update poll.
This poll can determine for roblox moderators if an update is worthy to we as Robloxians.
This includes us voting yes or no to a certain update. This can help the Moderators ability to see our interests and non-interests for Robloxian features. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Quorum
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4680 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:30 PM |
No support, again. Sorry.
ROBLOX isn't a democracy, and besides, ROBLOXians already show their displeasure/distaste of certain updates through the utilisation of this sub-forum. Sometimes, features that people perceive as being bad usually turn out to be brilliant, and become well used. The core example of this would be the 2.0 body, which was hated when it was first introduced. Look at it now. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
bvalere
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7365 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:30 PM |
Yes they should do this, but it shouldn't be considered for ALL updates they put into action. Big updates should have more attention than little updates - fixing bugs, improving the system, etc.
Support. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:31 PM |
@Quorm
I'm not saying it's a democracy.
I'm saying this poll could help them see interests in other Roblox players. This forum and the poll combined can help them a lot for what to and not what to update. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Quorum
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4680 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:36 PM |
@Make, Regardless. Users shouldn't be able to affect what is, and what isn't, updated. It has been proven that ROBLOXians cannot do that reliably, as shown with the 2.0 bodies, MarketplaceService, GlobalLighting (for some), Bevels (whilst aesthetically pleasing, they were a performance hinderance that didn't work correctly with the new lighting system). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:37 PM |
@Quorm
Those updates are too late to vote. I'm actually talking about big updates that can happen in the future and not little once. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Quorum
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Oct 2013 |
| Total Posts: 4680 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:39 PM |
@Make, Yes, I do realise that they're old updates, some of them extremely old but I'm using it as a point within this argument that large portions of ROBLOXians hate certain updates when they're first released, but then later soften to them.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:42 PM |
A poll can't be constructive. That makes it next to useless. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:43 PM |
@Quorum
I do understand where you are coming at about roblox not being a democracy and other things like that. You are correct. I'm no longer saying that roblox should have rights. This poll is actually suppose to help the moderators with other peoples interests. This idea and the forum can and will give them a full understanding. If you don't agree with it then that is fine with me. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:44 PM |
@Frozen
The poll and the forum can give the roblox moderators a full list of interests and not interests for robloxians. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:47 PM |
@Make: a FOURM can, But a poll cannot.
Because the fourm can be constructive, Whilst a poll cannot.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:50 PM |
@frozen
Couldn't they just make the poll for other people to post on of ideas for other people and then they can get a thumbs up and thumbs down. That one can actually remove the controversy of arguments from this forum?
And what ever what is at 80% it is considered an interest? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
padam11
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 15774 |
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:54 PM |
| But then there will be mixed votes. Many people hate change. So they will not vote for change. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:56 PM |
Sorry guys, let me put it all together.
There should be a poll for people to go into and suggest an idea that is not in the WNTS and there can be a thumbs up and down. If it is 80% thumbs up then the idea is considered an interest.
This poll can also solve ideas without arguing about it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 12:58 PM |
"@frozen Couldn't they just make the poll for other people to post on of ideas for other people and then they can get a thumbs up and thumbs down. That one can actually remove the controversy of arguments from this forum?
And what ever what is at 80% it is considered an interest?" Two flaws there-
1) *Makes a post* *Thumbs up it*
2) Those arguments can be (and before 2013 were) constructive. Removing them destroys construction, which ultimately makes the idea, and any idea, better. Improving the idea is more important, so then it satisfies more people. A poll cannot be constructive because it cannot apply an argument or a reason to improve the idea upon.
A SURVEY can be constructive done correctly, but roblox already does those. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 01:02 PM |
@Frozen
First thing is they would put it that so they wouldn't be able to thumb up their own idea.
And second since when do they do surveys? It is uncommon that they do surveys on this site. The surveys on this site would actually be different than the ones on different sites. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 01:04 PM |
@Frozen again
I mixed up the second one.
The second one they would add a commenting system for the ideas so that people can improve on the ideas that were posted on the survey. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 01:12 PM |
But why add a commenting system that's optional? I actually have to FORCE people into giving me constructive criticism. It's not something people give willingly, and I basically have to insult and shame them into it. It's haaaard.
If construction for disagreement was optional, and you could just say yes or no, why would you ever go through that hassle to explain your reasoning for saying no when you can just litterally say no, nothing more or less. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Nov 2013 01:19 PM |
I give up with this.
I'm in a 3 vs 1 with this suggestion. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|