|
| 17 Nov 2013 05:48 AM |
Why don't we have an International Alliance System so we can connect with other Nations in a quicker and more effective manner. So, we could have the alliance called "[NAME OF SYSTEM HERE] Alliance System" so we can make a more efficient use of allies. So, we'll get allies to join that group, this system will tell all our allies to perform an action and should drop in - in an instant. So the ranking could go like this:
1 - Immigration So we can keep all immigrants in a watched and secured area
2 - Citizen So all our allies know that they are the ones to defend
3 - Business Owner Ukrainians get the chance to turn their business international
4 - Police Officer In case a criminal goes from Kiev to an ally city so we can catch them quicker
5 - Government Employees So all the Government attendees can keep in touch and operate together
6 - Soldiers The main part, keeping each others country safe and protected
7 - General/General Major So we can have training's with other countries to stay in touch
8 - General of a country's army Each country has a general that lead's the army, this will be useful to command their own country among the others
9 - General of the alliance We all need one individual who needs to lead and order this alliances army, so we know what the objective and orders are
10 - Parliament of a country So we know who is important for each country
11 - The Alliance Parliament These people help put forth country debates within this alliance
12 - Ministers of a country So we know a certain country is still in this alliance
13 - Ministers of the alliance This is wear all debates are sorted out and events are arranged for the alliance
14 - Deputy Prime Minister This is not for the alliance, it is just to show who is which Prime Minister's right hand man
15 - Prime Minister Again, not for this alliance but to point out who governs which country
16 - President of a country This is to show which country is part of the alliance, so the presidents can call in an alliance at any time of need
17 - President of the alliance We obviously need someone to take care of it all, don't we?
Should we go with this idea? It could really give the support alliances should produce and bond with each other with. Post your thoughts below
**I'd be happy if you were in the [UKR] Unitary Republic of Ukraine before posting** |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Nov 2013 06:12 AM |
| Other groups may find it too tedious to work well... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 17 Nov 2013 07:32 AM |
| Who ever is President of the Alliance would have to much power. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Nov 2013 10:32 AM |
| They'd have a great amount of power. But someone trustworthy put in that position, that all the countries want to put forth. Not just any old guy and chuck him up as president. Just because they have too much power, doesn't mean you have to immediately outlaw them for having too much control. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|