Blizzaria
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 43605 |
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 09:37 AM |
They are 5-1 just won 44 - 7 against purdue
We lost one game that's it against #8 UCLA and we were winning 21 - 0 after the first half. Why won't they even put us in the top 25 for real there is teams who lost 2 games against crap teams (ex: Georgia) and still in the top 20!
Georgia is #15 and lost 2 -_-
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 09:47 AM |
you played:
Purdue, they are 1-4 Illinois, they are 3-2 South Dakota State, they are 2-3 UCLA, they are 5-1 and Southern Miss, they are 0-5
WOW YOUR SCHEDULE WAS HARD. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 09:47 AM |
| We'll end top 15 if we win the rest of our games which is very possible, our last test is against northwestern |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 09:48 AM |
oh and the record might be off by a few games cuz im 2 lazy go check either way your schedule hasn't been hard
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 09:49 AM |
| Be quiet pri were still a top 25 team |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 09:52 AM |
you don't deserve to be in the Top 25 when your only challenge so far has been UCLA and you lost by 20. You're 21 in the coaches poll if it makes you any less mad. I do think you'll crack the Top 25 in 1-2 weeks if you win you're games which you probably will
and I'm forgetting a game or something and some of the records might be wrong but yolo you still don't deserve to be Top 25 yet. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Blizzaria
|
  |
| Joined: 22 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 43605 |
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 10:16 AM |
umm UCLA is undefeated first of all
second of all the last 5 years we have lost at the MOST 4 games in a season
we are a top 25 team no gtfo
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 10:29 AM |
| pri pri u nob who u support? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 10:51 AM |
| don't really follow NCAAA Football that much but if I had to I'd say Penn State. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Guzzu
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Mar 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1539 |
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 10:52 AM |
and u got blown out by WISCONSIN last year in the BIG10 CHAMPIONSHIP
AND WISCONSIN WASNT EVEN SUPPOSED TO BE THERE ROFL
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 11:11 AM |
| I don't feel we deserve to be ranked. We have played up and down way too much. Sometimes I feel we could play anybody other times I feel we could get beat by anybody. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Swagudelo
|
  |
| Joined: 23 May 2013 |
| Total Posts: 24436 |
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 11:24 AM |
| Using your logic, the 5-0 Houston Cougars should be ranked |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 01:00 PM |
Rune we still are good enough to be ranked @pri nob that was last yr |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 04:00 PM |
| I get your "SEC bias" argument sort of, since Auburn is #24 and they have I'm pretty sure the same record as Nebraska, but they didn't screw up like the Cornhuskers did - that was awful they blew a 21-0 lead after half time. Now on the other hand unranked Auburn beat #24 (at the time) Ole Miss Rebels, but rankings don't mean anything. They lost 35-21 to the #6 LSU Tigers, which is logical. Now your argument: they beat a now 1-6 Western Carolina team from the Southern Conference. My prediction is Nebraska will be ranked in the top 25 next week. Nebraska's not a bad team, but not a top 20 calibur team either. Rankings do not really matter though, remember. #5 Stanford got beat by unranked Utah. #UnderDog |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 04:01 PM |
"but not a top 20 calibur team either." your such a genius |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 04:05 PM |
| Thank you, I do know a lot about football, not everything though. Any who, I'm guessing you are a Nebraska fan? And I agree GA is overrated, they could probably lose to Vanderbilt. I do predict GA in that game though. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 04:19 PM |
| sarcasm sir, nebraskas obviously a top 20 team |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 04:38 PM |
"2 games against crap teams"
lost to #3 clemson (6-0) lost to #14 missouri (6-0) hardly awful teams ok |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 04:45 PM |
"Auburn is #24 and they have I'm pretty sure the same record as Nebraska, but they didn't screw up like the Cornhuskers did - that was awful they blew a 21-0 lead after half time. Now on the other hand unranked Auburn beat #24 (at the time) Ole Miss Rebels, but rankings don't mean anything. They lost 35-21 to the #6 LSU Tigers, which is logical. Now your argument: they beat a now 1-6 Western Carolina team from the Southern Conference."
every fbs team auburn has played is currently at or above .500 on the season nebraska has only played 3 fbs teams at or above .500 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 04:50 PM |
| Were still better. Gosh all these novice people coming to sf |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dpack123
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 9009 |
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 04:52 PM |
"nebraskas obviously a top 20 team"
LOL GET OFF WHATEVER YOU'RE ON |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
tgross25
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 35765 |
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 04:53 PM |
>rugs calling other people "novices to the SF"
lol |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 18 Oct 2013 05:01 PM |
Nebraska should be ranked They are a better team than Auburn |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|