|
| 06 Sep 2013 05:42 PM |
The Scherzer-Sanchez-Verlander rotation the Big 3 yet?
Because tbh it may be the best 1-2-3 in MLB history or somewhere up there (no i didnt research the 1-2-3s in MLB history) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
123yonnd
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 19 Jul 2008 |
| Total Posts: 66637 |
|
|
| 06 Sep 2013 06:14 PM |
Nowhere even close. Glavine-Maddux-Smoltz is the best three headed monster ever to be in a rotation in the modern age. Hudson-Zito-Mulder is #2.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
jakeboss5
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Jan 2013 |
| Total Posts: 656 |
|
|
| 06 Sep 2013 06:18 PM |
| Scherzer and Sanchez both have an era of under 3.00 I believe. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
123yonnd
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 19 Jul 2008 |
| Total Posts: 66637 |
|
|
| 06 Sep 2013 06:24 PM |
Here are some more trios recently formed.
Cain-Lincecum-Bumgarner Kershaw-Greinke-Ryu Strasburg-Gonzalez-Zimermann |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PhilCoke
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 11031 |
|
|
| 06 Sep 2013 06:25 PM |
| Verlander, for the most part, hasn't exactly been up to par this year. He's still got a fairly decent ERA, but he's been more hittable this season. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 06 Sep 2013 06:36 PM |
| you can't beat glavine-maddux-smoltz |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
dpack123
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 9009 |
|
|
| 06 Sep 2013 06:39 PM |
PELFREY-CORREIA-ALBERS FTW
“Many people say I'm the best women's soccer player in the world. I don't think so. And because of that, someday I just might be.” -Mia Hamm |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 06 Sep 2013 09:04 PM |
| Donny I'd take Verlander-Scherzer-Sanchez over those three. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
123yonnd
|
  |
 |
| Joined: 19 Jul 2008 |
| Total Posts: 66637 |
|
|
| 06 Sep 2013 09:20 PM |
| Then you have a lot of World Series losses. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PhilCoke
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 11031 |
|
|
| 07 Sep 2013 10:50 AM |
| In last year's World Series, it was mainly because the Tigers offense just wasn't there. They pitched pretty well, with Verlander being the only exception. Now, I'm not really trying to defend the claim about how they're "one of the top three"; I'm just pointing that if the Tigers offense weren't so cold, three out of the four Tigers pitchers that made World Series starts could've won. Everybody BUT Verlander pitched well in that World Series. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|