|
| 30 Aug 2013 06:14 AM |
I've been watching the BBC news channel for days for news on the chemical attacks this week and have been thinking about the possibilities of a WW3. David Cameron is wrong about sending troops out as a result of last nights vote. In my eyes he's trying to keep the friendship between the UK and America by impressing him. Obama has said that he will act alone with out the UK but still keep the countries friendship. America have got many allies to stand with them. Assad also has allies like Russia who could take his side.
What do you think? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
brett1337
|
  |
| Joined: 18 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 6240 |
|
|
| 30 Aug 2013 06:17 AM |
| no it wont, nobody has the balls to start WW3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Aug 2013 06:26 AM |
Obama thinks he does. He doesn't know what he's stepping into if he fights. Millions of people will be killed in the rage of war if he doesn't stop then he will be left with half an army dead and the other half injured. If Syria has killed its own people what will it do to his troops? This is why the UK need to step down.
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Aug 2013 06:29 AM |
| would war 3 would be the end of all of us |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Aug 2013 06:36 AM |
It could. Since ww2 nuclear weapons have been developed. We've seen what can happen when one is dropped when one was tested in Japan. The bomb destroyed half a mile of land and left the air polluted. It could cause huge deaths and terribly effect the lives of millions of people when the gasses of the bomb spread. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|