|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:01 AM |
I say it should only be used on clans of 40k+
Agreed? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
crplsteve
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8638 |
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:02 AM |
| Declined, it was agreed that a superclan is "A clan with over 10-15K members." Back in 08, and again in 2012. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
crplsteve
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8638 |
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:03 AM |
| Also your like a mini BRIANO. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:03 AM |
crpl, look at the size comparatively, even since 2012 clans of grown much larger.
It's time the term evolved, it's outdated. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
crplsteve
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8638 |
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:05 AM |
| No, it was agreed that 10-15K+ was superclan, so it stays, |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:05 AM |
| It's pretty much always been the first 2 or 3 pages of groups |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:06 AM |
| It was agreed back in 2012, almost two years ago. Clans have grown much larger since then. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:07 AM |
| 40k+ would be 1 1/2 pages of groups. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
crplsteve
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8638 |
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:07 AM |
| 30K+ is more of a faierer number, clans haven't grown that much. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
crplsteve
|
  |
| Joined: 01 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8638 |
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 11:08 AM |
| anyway not you or I can say what is an what isn't a superclan. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 27 Aug 2013 12:49 PM |
I declare myself the official declarer of what is a superclan.
I declare a superclan to be 40k+
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|