|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:28 AM |
They existed before Tober said they did, as he only labeled it. All wars are wars of "endurance" unless the opposing parties set a predetermined date for the war to end. One point destroyed.
Second, Tober specified that the only way to win was by waiting until the other team surrendered. Thus, raids are irrelevant in the outcome of the war, and should thus be considered pointless. Two points destroyed.
Third, VAK is not weak. They are most likely simply waiting for TGI to lose interest, and will then launch a huge attack. This indicates VAK knows what it is doing, and thus by doing nothing, is proving superior to TGI. Three points destroyed.
Hopefully, we can stop our petty conflicts and agree with each other. Though in my experience, this is quite rare.
~Virgil~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:31 AM |
In the scoreboard of logic, VAK is currently in the lead with three points, and TGI has 0 points. Or at least, that is how TGI sees it.
~Virgil~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:32 AM |
We know this?
You mumbojumbo |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
iKeno
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jan 2008 |
| Total Posts: 27490 |
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:33 AM |
captin decided not to read the thread
" No rest for the best. " |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:34 AM |
Apparently not. I've seen several of your ranks argue against these points. I was simply showing why they were wrong.
~Virgil~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Crakal
|
  |
| Joined: 15 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 525 |
|
| |
|
MTGS
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Jul 2013 |
| Total Posts: 2615 |
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:36 AM |
I agree with you. VAK could be waiting to find their weakspot. I know VAK can do better than this, they've been through so much. They won basically all superclans. They can beat TGI.
-MTG. #VAK. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Lucara
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Oct 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5741 |
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:37 AM |
"They existed before Tober said they did, as he only labeled it. All wars are wars of "endurance" unless the opposing parties set a predetermined date for the war to end. One point destroyed."
I don't see how you destroyed a point. This just means VAK will finally realize that all of their wars have been endurance wars and shut up about it just because Tober labelled it as such. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:37 AM |
Of course they can and most likely will. TGI is too full of pride to see this and plan accordingly.
~Virgil~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:39 AM |
| You only presume that this will happen.. In the mean time, TGI is showing that it's capable of winning. VAK? Most of their raids towards our forts have failed. However like you say, they could do a Mass raid when we "Get bored". |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:40 AM |
"Second, Tober specified that the only way to win was by waiting until the other team surrendered. Thus, raids are irrelevant in the outcome of the war, and should thus be considered pointless. Two points destroyed."
I think you'll find raids would be useful in bringing about an opposition surrender. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:40 AM |
I find it a very likely outcome.
~Virgil~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jul 2013 11:41 AM |
No teacher. It wouldn't. You can't fight an enemy that isn't there, so raiding is counter-productive.
~Virgil~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|