|
| 08 Jul 2013 12:56 PM |
Deadzonezackzak, an owner of two popular places is forced to choose between them when he runs out of BC. Roblox runs on user places, without them, it wouldn't be roblox. Owners of popular places like deadzonezackzak should get more permanent places. I think it's important to keep popular places up. Builders Club should not be a barrier of entertainment. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
kingmatt2
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6494 |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 01:13 PM |
Support.
10,000 Vitsits = 1 place. 20,000 visits = 1 more places.
AND SO ON! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 01:18 PM |
@king 1 place every 10 thousand may be a bit too generous, but maybe admins can choose certain people that they consider popular. Maybe 1 place every 100,000 places, and a cap of 5 places this way. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 02:26 PM |
| They're already giving former BC 5 places, but it's taking way too long and people are already complaining. Anyways, if it takes them years to give former BC 5 places, I'll support. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 02:27 PM |
I remember saying this a lot awhile ago, with the cap being at 500k visits. -Do not summon me again!- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 02:28 PM |
One place for 500 k visits. That seems fair enough for me, cap 5.
~ Do you want to see the Rabbits David? ~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 02:31 PM |
| Thanks for the support, guys |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 02:39 PM |
Loss of BC from popular place owners means loss of Popular Places
Without popular places, there's no entertainment or yet more inspiration
Without entertainment means loss of players -- If all the popular games were to go, then...
Loss of players means loss of BCers
Loss of BCer's, means loss of money
Loss of money means less cash to the Admins + Less Servers
Less Servers means Downgrading to ROBLOX's Existing Population
Downgrading means goodbye mega places, hello to many, many acc's being deleted to make up space.
And yeah, ROBLOX would decline yet not to out completely |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 02:40 PM |
| They should only be able to get 1 place per game.Say the game gets 500 000 visits,the creator gets an extra place.He can't get another one from this game,but he can earn a new one with the new place. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
koolkid64
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Dec 2009 |
| Total Posts: 12008 |
|
| |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 03:26 PM |
Though an impartial suggestion, it would pervade copied places and games with apocryphal titles. Perhaps if you form a system preventing this, my stance would be amended. In the meanwhile, I oppose the idea.
~Unfeasible Ambitions Are the Grandest Ones~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
gigabic
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4344 |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 03:40 PM |
| Total support. And this is noob proof because noob place copiers who spam a lot have difficulty advertising 2+ places at once successfully. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 04:32 PM |
@Cop: They lied, is why its not out.
Reese gave all the proof by replying to a big complaining thread saying "NBC, ex-BC or not, are not suppose to have more than one active place". |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Nick99984
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Jun 2008 |
| Total Posts: 330 |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 04:37 PM |
I support this.
~Professional Russian~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
sba2004
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Feb 2009 |
| Total Posts: 5219 |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 04:41 PM |
Im not a famous user, but whatever
Support |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
glowpod
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Jul 2007 |
| Total Posts: 1267 |
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 05:14 PM |
Giving free stuff, WNTS.
~GP |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 08 Jul 2013 11:21 PM |
| Kind of like the ifunny publication limit? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|