practice
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 15412 |
|
| |
|
practice
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Oct 2007 |
| Total Posts: 15412 |
|
| |
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:22 PM |
| You're immature for even calling a female such a insulting name |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Buc391
|
  |
| Joined: 11 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 11373 |
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:22 PM |
| you shouldve called her a good dog |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Verodoxys
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Jun 2012 |
| Total Posts: 18454 |
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:23 PM |
| this thread tastes like immaturity and butthurt |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:24 PM |
Never, EVER, call a girl a name like that. Especially one as nice as LM. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:24 PM |
I don't know who your but I think most people on this earth understand that connor is a boys name practice
Craktheravan could not say it any better "practice makes perfect unless you are the owner of HAU"
{~The Domino Hath Spoken~} |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:26 PM |
Dude, I LOVE flaming.
#2008'er
Back in my day we DID flame, and we did it ALL the time. I will continue to do it until I quit, no matter who it is directed at.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHYSp1MBgqY
As for that, that isn't flame, that's just you breaking ROBLOX rules, which now since making this thread I will show the evidence of you swearing to the admins.
Enjoy your ban. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:27 PM |
"Never, EVER, call a girl a name like that. Especially one as nice as LM."
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ScarXD
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10323 |
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:39 PM |
Connor with all do respect I read Fort Tor's rules and they just another one of those annoying groups that is very difficult to win at because of the horrid rules behind the fort.
"Both teams must hold for 20 minutes to win. Timer resets if other team captures." I don't believe if someone is attacking a base, they aren't like, "OKAY SO YEAH WE HELD OFF THIS LONG AND THERE IS MORE COMING, TIME OUT GUYS WE WON." No they'd simply keep attacking and when you remove them/shut down server, it's pure idiocy.
"-Five VL members must be there for an official raid. (Must have prior picture for raid to count)" Reasonable, 5 is a bit much but what ever.
"-Exploiting from either side makes the raid void (Doesn't count)." Basically, a person from your group could exploit when they are losing and make it a tie, such a huge loophole in losing right there. Usually, I'd just crash ban the exploiter no matter what team and as long as the server is still playable I'd keep it going. If the server was destroyed, I'd ask the enemy leader if I have his permission to shut down the server and restart.
"-You must contact an ONLINE Executive+ that you are raiding BEFORE coming." Wars are wars, you don't tell an enemy about a surprise attack. If you have the 5+ rule, this rule should be invalid due to the fact if you are warned days before at the exact time and you didn't show up, therefor is a surrender. You can have one or the other.
"-Flaming is allowed to an extent. Anything over normal ROBLOX rules however will get you banned." Reasonable.
"-No FPS Throttling." Reasonable, that is along with exploiting and should be crash banned.
"-2 Hour raid limit" Most idiotic rule I've dealt with, with many groups simply due to the fact they get "tired" of defending. Sorry pal but it's you keep fighting till the enemy gives up. You didn't see Russia in the battle of Stalingard say "OKAY 2 HOURS LIMIT, GO LEAVE AND COME BACK TOMORROW" that single battle lasted for over 5 months and weeks straight, the Russians finally won that battle by mass number. The time limit rule is by far the most idiotic rule that has ever existed next to the defending group owning the base till they have won.
"-No empty server raiding." This should go along with the 5+ member rule, or the tell a high rank first rule. It's pretty much a waste to explain this when it's already known to have 5+ or warn an Executive+.
That is my opinion on those rules, some I agree on others, I can see why people wouldn't want to waste their time dealing with a group who plays like this.
Guardian Units of Nations,Leader~Scar~
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
waleedprw
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 2230 |
|
| |
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:56 PM |
I see why you will be lonely for the rest of your life.
I would never disrespect a female. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
DarkVakt
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 8712 |
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:56 PM |
lol so stupid
peace 'n luv ✌ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ryanr23
|
  |
| Joined: 17 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 40374 |
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 05:57 PM |
"Never, EVER, call a girl a name like that. Especially one as nice as LM."
if she is acting like a female dog then you expect to be called one
simple as that, |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 06:00 PM |
"Both teams must hold for 20 minutes to win. Timer resets if other team captures." I don't believe if someone is attacking a base, they aren't like, "OKAY SO YEAH WE HELD OFF THIS LONG AND THERE IS MORE COMING, TIME OUT GUYS WE WON." No they'd simply keep attacking and when you remove them/shut down server, it's pure idiocy.
Point made here, but it's just so raids won't go on forever.
"-Five VL members must be there for an official raid. (Must have prior picture for raid to count)" Reasonable, 5 is a bit much but what ever.
I change it to whoever we are at war with, and how much they require at their fort. So yeah this rule changes.
"-Exploiting from either side makes the raid void (Doesn't count)." Basically, a person from your group could exploit when they are losing and make it a tie, such a huge loophole in losing right there. Usually, I'd just crash ban the exploiter no matter what team and as long as the server is still playable I'd keep it going. If the server was destroyed, I'd ask the enemy leader if I have his permission to shut down the server and restart.
I hate exploiters bro. If someone from VL exploited I would exile them.
"-You must contact an ONLINE Executive+ that you are raiding BEFORE coming." Wars are wars, you don't tell an enemy about a surprise attack. If you have the 5+ rule, this rule should be invalid due to the fact if you are warned days before at the exact time and you didn't show up, therefor is a surrender. You can have one or the other.
Point made, however the rule will stand as long as other bases have it.
"-Flaming is allowed to an extent. Anything over normal ROBLOX rules however will get you banned." Reasonable.
Gotta love flame.
"-No FPS Throttling." Reasonable, that is along with exploiting and should be crash banned.
FPS I consider unfair, although I will admit to using it at games such as ROBLOX Battle time to time, though never at forts.
"-2 Hour raid limit" Most idiotic rule I've dealt with, with many groups simply due to the fact they get "tired" of defending. Sorry pal but it's you keep fighting till the enemy gives up. You didn't see Russia in the battle of Stalingard say "OKAY 2 HOURS LIMIT, GO LEAVE AND COME BACK TOMORROW" that single battle lasted for over 5 months and weeks straight, the Russians finally won that battle by mass number. The time limit rule is by far the most idiotic rule that has ever existed next to the defending group owning the base till they have won.
Same as a few others, as long as other groups have I see no reason to not have it ourselves.
"-No empty server raiding." This should go along with the 5+ member rule, or the tell a high rank first rule. It's pretty much a waste to explain this when it's already known to have 5+ or warn an Executive+.
Just a bit of protection against flooding before any VL are there.
"Practice makes perfect, unless you're the leader of HAU." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 06:04 PM |
practice,
your a dumb-O-ass.
get over it.
//- Vɪᴄᴛᴏʀɪᴀ621 -\\ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
ScarXD
|
  |
| Joined: 03 Dec 2010 |
| Total Posts: 10323 |
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 06:04 PM |
Well Connor, I'm glad you respectfully saw what I was saying. I can agree with you if another group is doing it, you fight fire with fire. I personally would never use most of these terms even if another team used them unless they tried to abuse them as some sort of shield. Anyways best luck to both sides during this war and hopefully, it can turn into less of a neck grabbing battle and more enjoyable for both sides to enjoy the outcome and gameplay of the war.
Guardian Units of Nations,Leader~Scar~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Jul 2013 06:05 PM |
Indeed Scar.
I try to be fairer than others, but sometimes their rules go overboard so I have to counter-act it.
"Practice makes perfect, unless you're the leader of HAU." |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
waleedprw
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 2230 |
|
|
| 06 Jul 2013 01:19 PM |
connor is epic everyone against connor stfu and gtfo VL is epic anyone flames VL gtfo and stfu now HAU is a fail pls dun join it it gross the leader is corrupted111 his clan is filled with his slaves11
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|