|
| 04 Jul 2013 02:56 PM |
This was in the blog post ---------------------------------- sidekick601: How do you guys do it? How do you moderate every single image on ROBLOX? It’s a question I’ve been holding for so long. I mean, there are millions of players on ROBLOX. Is it a bot?
A human looks at each one before it goes live on the site. If you could write an image-moderating bot that was at least as good as our human moderators, we would like to buy it from you, and so would many other companies. ----------------------------------
Is it even POSSIBLE to check an image to see if it has innapropriate things? I know finding text in a image is pretty easy, but is it even possible to try and find something in a image that can change so much? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Jul 2013 03:03 PM |
| Google did it for both their image search and safesearch. Not sure how though. It's probably on a blog somewhere. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
xSIXx
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 9202 |
|
|
| 04 Jul 2013 03:04 PM |
no bots involved
it's all human eye.
but yes it seems like it is possible, if you run an image through google image search and all you get is a bunch of you know what websites containing the image (unless you took your own pictures... nevermind) then block it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
blocco
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 29474 |
|
|
| 04 Jul 2013 03:04 PM |
| It's possible. Just really really hard. It involves the use of bebop protocols, and you might get a lot of false positives or true negatives, or false negatives even. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
xSIXx
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Aug 2010 |
| Total Posts: 9202 |
|
|
| 04 Jul 2013 03:07 PM |
"false negatives"
oh god, i can just imagine the images with false negatives. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
blocco
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Aug 2008 |
| Total Posts: 29474 |
|
|
| 04 Jul 2013 03:09 PM |
| I've gotten quite a few with Google Image Search. I stared at 'em. You know... cuz I was thinking why it didn't get caught... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Jul 2013 03:11 PM |
| If Google can't make something 99.9% reliable to check images, nobody can. Google have a huge amount of money (from selling user data and ads) and they spend quite a bit on their search engine. Nobody can moderate every image on the internet, so they make a bot, and go to extreme length to make it good. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Jul 2013 03:17 PM |
It's possible to filter *many* things, but not all. For instance, the not very enforced but still existent ban on realistic weaponry. We are very far from accurate abstract object recognition. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Jul 2013 03:29 PM |
I remember reading the rules a few years ago and didn't it say you can't upload real pictures containing human beings or violent pictures?
Why are famous people allowed to be uploaded, but a picture of me not allowed to be uploaded? If I was famous, would I be allowed to post pictures of myself? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 04 Jul 2013 03:56 PM |
^Yes and no.
The Unwise Wizard of Scripters has spoken. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|