hawksfan
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 24644 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 02:42 AM |
POTATO MAN ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ
{The raging (human) Rainbow Dash fan} ♫ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DznQg08lMDc 1:48 ♫ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Wuten
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jun 2013 |
| Total Posts: 13791 |
|
| |
|
muhmoa12
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 1763 |
|
| |
|
hawksfan
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 24644 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:15 PM |
POTATO MAN LOVES YOU
{The raging (human) Rainbow Dash fan} ♫ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DznQg08lMDc 1:48 ♫ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:16 PM |
Hey look, it's my hoodie.
BEHOLD FOR I AM AN OTER USING THE ROYAL VOICE. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:16 PM |
ohaider long time no see amirite |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:16 PM |
looks like a turd
:DarkFossa: |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
girlsami
|
  |
| Joined: 20 Dec 2007 |
| Total Posts: 5957 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:17 PM |
Hello!
~*When life gives you lemons, Throw them back and ask for something better*~ Don't make me write your name in the death note |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:18 PM |
ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ ☻/ /▌ / \
AAA HE SPLIT BOB APART
LIER
HE DOESINT LOVE ANYONE
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:19 PM |
You know, laws of matter are opposing against the big bang theory.
and some scientist agree with both. Logic here.
In other words... POTATO
Also,
In the classical theory of gravity, which is based on real space-time, there are only two possible ways the universe can behave. Either it has existed for an infinite time, or else it had a beginning at a singularity at some finite time in the past. In fact, the singularity theorems show it must be the second possibility. In the quantum theory of gravity, on the other hand, a third possibility arises. Because one is using Euclidean space-times, in which the time direction is on the same footing as directions in space, it is possible for space-time to be finite in extent and yet to have no singularities that formed a boundary or edge.
Every time you jump, you experience gravity. It pulls you back down to the ground. Without gravity, you'd float off into the atmosphere -- along with all of the other matter on Earth.
You see gravity at work any time you drop a book, step on a scale or toss a ball up into the air. It's such a constant presence in our lives, we seldom marvel at the mystery of it -- but even with several well-received theories out there attempting to explain why a book falls to the ground (and at the same rate as a pebble or a couch, at that), they're still just theories. The mystery of gravity's pull is pretty much intact.
So what do we know about gravity? We know that it causes any two objects in the universe to be drawn to one another. We know that gravity assisted in forming the universe, that it keeps the moon in orbit around the Earth, and that it can be harnessed for more mundane applications like gravity-powered motors or gravity-powered lamps.
As for the science behind the action, we know that Isaac Newton defined gravity as a force -- one that attracts all objects to all other objects. We know that Albert Einstein said gravity is a result of the curvature of space-time. These two theories are the most common and widely held (if somewhat incomplete) explanations of gravity.
In this article, we'll look at Newton's theory of gravity, Einstein's theory of gravity and we'll touch on a more recent view of the phenomenon as well.
Although many people had already noted that gravity exists, Newton was the first to develop a cohesive explanation for gravity, so we'll start there. Newton stated the following on the subject at hand. " Every point mass attracts every single other point mass by a force pointing along the line intersecting both points. The force is proportional to the product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them:[3]
F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}\ ,
where:
F is the force between the masses, G is the gravitational constant, m1 is the first mass, m2 is the second mass, and r is the distance between the centers of the masses.
Diagram of two masses attracting one another
Assuming SI units, F is measured in newtons (N), m1 and m2 in kilograms (kg), r in meters (m), and the constant G is approximately equal to 6.674×10−11 N m2 kg−2.[4] " |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:19 PM |
come back to OtLib bb baby come back you can blame it all on me |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:20 PM |
Longest signature ever, :P I think it's a one day signature though. XD
In the classical theory of gravity, which is based on real space-time, there are only two possible ways the universe can behave. Either it has existed for an infinite time, or else it had a beginning at a singularity at some finite time in the past. In fact, the singularity theorems show it must be the second possibility. In the quantum theory of gravity, on the other hand, a third possibility arises. Because one is using Euclidean space-times, in which the time direction is on the same footing as directions in space, it is possible for space-time to be finite in extent and yet to have no singularities that formed a boundary or edge.
Every time you jump, you experience gravity. It pulls you back down to the ground. Without gravity, you'd float off into the atmosphere -- along with all of the other matter on Earth.
You see gravity at work any time you drop a book, step on a scale or toss a ball up into the air. It's such a constant presence in our lives, we seldom marvel at the mystery of it -- but even with several well-received theories out there attempting to explain why a book falls to the ground (and at the same rate as a pebble or a couch, at that), they're still just theories. The mystery of gravity's pull is pretty much intact.
So what do we know about gravity? We know that it causes any two objects in the universe to be drawn to one another. We know that gravity assisted in forming the universe, that it keeps the moon in orbit around the Earth, and that it can be harnessed for more mundane applications like gravity-powered motors or gravity-powered lamps.
As for the science behind the action, we know that Isaac Newton defined gravity as a force -- one that attracts all objects to all other objects. We know that Albert Einstein said gravity is a result of the curvature of space-time. These two theories are the most common and widely held (if somewhat incomplete) explanations of gravity.
In this article, we'll look at Newton's theory of gravity, Einstein's theory of gravity and we'll touch on a more recent view of the phenomenon as well.
Although many people had already noted that gravity exists, Newton was the first to develop a cohesive explanation for gravity, so we'll start there. Newton stated the following on the subject at hand. " Every point mass attracts every single other point mass by a force pointing along the line intersecting both points. The force is proportional to the product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them:[3]
F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}\ ,
where:
F is the force between the masses, G is the gravitational constant, m1 is the first mass, m2 is the second mass, and r is the distance between the centers of the masses.
Diagram of two masses attracting one another
Assuming SI units, F is measured in newtons (N), m1 and m2 in kilograms (kg), r in meters (m), and the constant G is approximately equal to 6.674×10−11 N m2 kg−2.[4] " |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:20 PM |
| http://sketchtoy.com/42577443 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
LolHatz
|
  |
| Joined: 05 Apr 2013 |
| Total Posts: 26350 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:20 PM |
| AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAITSTHETURDMAN! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
hawksfan
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jul 2009 |
| Total Posts: 24644 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:21 PM |
k coming back to OTLib
{The raging (human) Rainbow Dash fan} ♫ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DznQg08lMDc 1:48 ♫ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|