|
| 01 Jul 2013 09:54 PM |
| blackhawks' 2 goals in 17 seconds was rated #9 on espn's top 10 plays of 2013. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 09:55 PM |
| wait wat where is the list |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 09:55 PM |
| none of the plays on the list won a team the championship... |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 09:56 PM |
I didn't know winning a championship was criteria for making a great play. seriously, you have should have no complaint. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 09:57 PM |
| it's what you play for in a sport. you play to win it all. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 09:58 PM |
Nah, I play because it's fun. The winning part is just a subsidiary. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:00 PM |
okay, i understand that part.
but its not like a play involving fun time > a play involving winning a championship |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:01 PM |
| are you legit going to tell me right now that you actually take into account other stuff that did not involve the play itself? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:03 PM |
@muffin
yes, because what if they didn't score the second goal? what if they didn't even score the first goal? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:05 PM |
| Then there wouldn't even be a play in the first place and you wouldn't be complaining right now. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:06 PM |
| yeah, but it did happen. and i wouldn't call it complaining, i'd call it arguing. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:07 PM |
@DNA (idc who ur main is) remove the fact that it was a championship game then tell me where you'd rank it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:09 PM |
@muffin
either way, besides the boston-toronto series, tell me the last time that something like this happened. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:10 PM |
if the boston v toronto game was on there higher than the 17 seconds thing for the blackhawks, it deserved to be higher
without that, boston wouldn't have been in the SC finals |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:12 PM |
@sir
surprisingly, it wasn't.
but either way, advancing to the next round < winning a stanley cup, no matter how you do it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:13 PM |
| surprisingly, it wasn't on the list at all.* |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:14 PM |
well iss ESPN doesn't like hockey too much anyway
what more do you expect |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:15 PM |
that's really the main point of this thread.
the world doesn't revolve around tebow's ballsweat or lebron making a video. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:26 PM |
@DNA idrc. how good were the goals? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 10:28 PM |
the first one was a great pass from toews to bickell.
the second one was off the post, bounced to bolland, and he squeezed it through rask and a defender. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|