|
| 30 Jun 2013 04:24 PM |
| ROBLOX, listen to the users! No one wanted 3.0, yet you make it anyway and put removing 3.0 in WNTS! This new feature that is coming out, NO ONE WANTS IT! This is a "FREE" game, and you need to listen to the users! Don't just put what YOU want in the game, but only put what the users want in the game! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
bunnyX123
|
  |
| Joined: 04 Sep 2009 |
| Total Posts: 1939 |
|
|
| 30 Jun 2013 04:25 PM |
chances mod will read this= zero but yeah i fully agree with u sonny |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Jun 2013 04:26 PM |
| ROBLOX is excellent for responding to their users issues. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
lupine
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Jun 2008 |
| Total Posts: 3561 |
|
|
| 30 Jun 2013 04:26 PM |
a) 3.0 - You don't have to buy it, you don't have to use it. a1) Nobody wanted Robloxian 2.0, gear, or SafeChat to be read-only. b) I agree with you, this new "Pay to enter" feature is just dumb b1) This feature is actually just going to do more damage than good
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Bergan
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Nov 2007 |
| Total Posts: 4942 |
|
|
| 30 Jun 2013 04:27 PM |
| I agree. They should focus more on suggestions than things that aren't really needed. Surely there must be at least a few suggestions that are around as good as the team's updates are to the team. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
RoAnt
|
  |
| Joined: 14 Jul 2008 |
| Total Posts: 16794 |
|
|
| 30 Jun 2013 04:30 PM |
| Ignorance... ignorance everywhere! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 30 Jun 2013 04:30 PM |
In honesty, their idea of their's will develop more problems than solve them. People will become more successful with scamming and people will copy other people's games a lot more, free modelled places might also shoot up. This is exactly what almost all users are wanting to stop to which Roblox is also attempting to (however poorly in the eyes of most) to stop also. It just doesn't make much sense. -Do not summon me again!- |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Tappier
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Apr 2013 |
| Total Posts: 14077 |
|
| |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:41 AM |
| Im just saying that no one wanted those, yet they made them anyway. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Tappier
|
  |
| Joined: 10 Apr 2013 |
| Total Posts: 14077 |
|
| |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:43 AM |
Original poster is ignorant all the updates he claims that "ruin" roblox are optional... and some people like them so how is it "ruining" roblox...?
Some people don't realize how much the roblox staff does for it's users
~Fattycat17 is here to stay so umad haters |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
sassle12
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Sep 2009 |
| Total Posts: 2382 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:51 AM |
@captin,
If they were so good at it why haven't they replied to a single thread I've made. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Ran502
|
  |
| Joined: 29 Jan 2012 |
| Total Posts: 1720 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:53 AM |
| Well it doesn't matter if we didn't want them, who's in charge? Us or them? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
comet28
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 1692 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:56 AM |
| You know Dynamic Lightning? Suggested here. 3.0/2.0 was actually suggested here. Many other things were suggested here. Also, it's the place owners loss if they make it pay. Less place visit from NBCS. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
bvalere
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7365 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 11:58 AM |
"Im just saying that no one wanted those, yet they made them anyway."
>There were pros and cons with those features, so it wouldn't solve anything if they were to remove what they have already created.
The mods/developers do listen to our say in this, but not all ideas are respected equally as the next. We're just there to personally encourage the subject, not make it a reality if it had to be done by force. There are people in this community who want to see the best in ROBLOX, but whatever happens from this point on could result in either the rise of fall of ROBLOX in the future.
Even if we say that they don't listen, is our ideas any better then their's? Would we want an income of 10R$ daily, and then watch as the economy begins to drop down much worse then it's currently at? Would it be any different to allow a higher-grade BC membership so they could gain more sales no matter the expense? These are all things they must consider, because the outcome is less desirable then the influence 3.0 had on the community. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
bvalere
|
  |
| Joined: 26 Jan 2009 |
| Total Posts: 7365 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 12:00 PM |
CORRECTIONS: "the rise OR fall of..." "much worse then WHERE it's currently at?"
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
THEBIGC01
|
  |
| Joined: 02 Aug 2011 |
| Total Posts: 16543 |
|
| |
|
port753
|
  |
| Joined: 12 Jul 2011 |
| Total Posts: 277 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 12:10 PM |
Support. THIS IS A CONSPIRACY MAN! FIGHT DA POWA!!!!! |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
gigabic
|
  |
| Joined: 06 Sep 2010 |
| Total Posts: 4344 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 12:13 PM |
| 3.0 was actually a really good idea, we got a whole new face for us to troll with |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
pudinrox
|
  |
| Joined: 30 May 2010 |
| Total Posts: 2358 |
|
|
| 01 Jul 2013 12:34 PM |
WNTS Don't buy it if you don't like it. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|