3rdblox
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4741 |
|
|
| 22 Jun 2013 05:25 PM |
NBCs should be allowed to trade limiteds for 500 Robux a month. This would help limiteds "slide" again, instead of ending up stuck in a NBC's hands forever. Since the trade of limiteds also gets Robux out of circulation, this would greatly help ROBLOX fight the battle against inflation.
Debates. 1: AGAINST: This will stop people from buying Builder's Club. FOR: Actually, most who get Builder's Club are spoilt by their parents. They ask for the money, get it right there and then. They'll open their wallets just so they can see their child smile. AGAINST: Actually, some get it by doing chores/collecting pocket money FOR: True. But they're not just after limited trading, they want the Robux, Badges, Gamepasses and places. Limiteds don't top their list, at least not for many BCs. 2: AGAINST: NBCs would get rich. FOR: Limiteds is actually a "investment" business. You need money to make money. So, new NBCs wouldn't get rich fast. AGAINST: What if a NBC bought a 20 R$ item that shot up to a million or something? FOR: Well, they'd have to pay for the feature first, which would take about a year and a half. 3: AGAINST: Wait, no NBC will be able to afford that! FOR: Actually, some NBCs are rich. Famous place creators, TCers and former BCs. AGAINST: The former BCs wouldn't buy BC again. FOR: Look at debate one, where I defused that point. (If I missed a point, and you want to challenge me please do. It will make this interesting.)
Support: Thanks. No support: Why? I'm happy to debate this, that's the point of a forum. Stay civilised while debating though, I don't like flame wars. TL:DR: Either read the whole thing, or don't post. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jun 2013 05:26 PM |
| support, we shouldn't be stuck with limiteds |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Parthax
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6941 |
|
|
| 22 Jun 2013 05:30 PM |
No support, as some people only buy BC for the limited system, where roblox's money comes from. They're a corporation. Less BC=less money for them=less features for all of us.
cнecĸмαтe, ɴooвѕ. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Manwich1
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Jun 2010 |
| Total Posts: 1735 |
|
| |
|
3rdblox
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4741 |
|
|
| 22 Jun 2013 05:36 PM |
@Parthax, I doubt there's many of these people. The amount of Robux this would get out of circulation would greatly outweigh the small few who buy BC for limiteds. Less Robux = More demand for Robux. More demand for Robux = More people buying Robux/BC More people buying Robux/BC = More money. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jun 2013 05:37 PM |
| Please refer to debate #1. (@ two posts up) |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
3rdblox
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4741 |
|
| |
|
|
| 22 Jun 2013 06:04 PM |
"NBCs should be allowed to trade limiteds for 500 Robux a month."
Your post killed itself. 500 Robux = A little more than $5. BC monthly costs about $7 or $8. It's basically buying BC every month. I don't see any benefit of this unless you are a NBC with a place on the first page. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
Parthax
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Apr 2011 |
| Total Posts: 6941 |
|
| |
|
|
| 22 Jun 2013 06:43 PM |
| Support. I don't ever buy BC, and yet I've managed to snatch up many good limiteds, total value is around 3K right now, but I have no way of selling them. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
3rdblox
|
  |
| Joined: 09 Dec 2012 |
| Total Posts: 4741 |
|
|
| 22 Jun 2013 07:05 PM |
@Toxic, It's not giving them extra rights. The rule you're reffering to is "More rights for NBC/fewer privelages for BC" However, this isn't giving them extra features. They have to pay for them. It's basically a suggestion to add a new thing for users to buy. @Waza, I TC, and I could afford over half a year of this. I've never been BC, never will be. But yet I'm rich enough to pay for this. We don't all see Robux as dollars, and you can't buy BC with Robux. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 22 Jun 2013 07:10 PM |
| Your saying they would only be able to sell it for 500 robux. That's like they somehow managed to buy Donovan P. Sullivan (Gold Edition) and have to sell it for 500 robux if they want money. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jun 2013 01:34 PM |
@3rd.
Your major mistake being, your only comparing this idea to yourself, and not the vast majority. If there are millions of free users on ROBLOX, you really think most of them would profit from this without paying? No. At least 30%? No. If you don't have place visits racking in every 2 seconds, there's no way your going to get 500 Robux without purchasing it. It would just be for the lucky individuals who happen to get a lot of place visits whether it was from fake thumbnails, spamming, etc. This is only benefiting the rich NBC, which is a very small percentage (People on the front page, war bases, etc). |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 23 Jun 2013 01:39 PM |
| Also, if a former BC member simply loses his BC but has a super rare hat worth 30k, he can purchase months and months of BC without having to pay a dime to ROBLOX. No. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|