|
| 11 Jun 2013 09:08 PM |
Here is my idea. On every BC person, (They are the only people who can use trade system) there is a "Trustworthy" and a "Not trustworthy" button on their profile. So lets say someone has scammed you. You cannot post that they have scammed you or you will be banned for a personal attack. If someone is legit with their trades, yes, you can post a forum about them, but I think my idea is better and you can just press the "Trustworthy" button. The people who can press the Trustworthy buttons can only be BC. (Yes, they can only use trade system) You can only do it once, to prevent trolling and pressing the "Not trustworthy" button 10 times to make their score go lower. You can also only do it to people you have used the trade system with to prevent even more trolling. So a bar appears on their profile, showing their Trustworthiness percent. Lets say a person has 31% trustworthiness. You know not to Trade with them, because they will most likely do a troll trade on scam you. If someone has 100% Trustworthiness, you know they are a great person to trade with, because it is more than likely that they will be legit. Support? Great! No Support? Feedback
|
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2013 09:14 PM |
| I support the only problem is, is that if they have a 100% they could still scam you. It happens all the time, you get something dumb while the other person gets your most prize possession. So its 50 50 for me. Half don't support, half support, good idea though. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2013 09:17 PM |
"pressing the "Not trustworthy" button 10 times to make their score go lower."
So, 1 for up and 10 for down? Seems like an irrational ratio. Just keep it 1:1 since there's already other limiting factors.
--
I've never used the Trading System so I can't say too much, but this sounds nice.
-Virtualdarks |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2013 09:18 PM |
| You can only vote per trade you've done. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2013 09:33 PM |
| @Virtual, This must be a misunderstanding, because I meant to have that 1:1 ratio in the first place. Sorry. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2013 09:34 PM |
@MilknOreos
I must have read it wrong then. My apologizes. ^^
-Virtualdarks |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
yersa87
|
  |
| Joined: 27 Jan 2013 |
| Total Posts: 29 |
|
| |
|
|
| 11 Jun 2013 09:44 PM |
Spell right and use grammar. [Forum Rules]
My final words... (Laugh out loud) < Grammar friendly. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 11 Jun 2013 09:54 PM |
Un-support I saw that trustworthy/untrunt blah No one would trade me, and I would make no more money off dim-wits ;3 |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|