|
| 10 Jun 2013 10:05 AM |
A country with a ravaged civil war? (a majority has guns) Or a country with a better economy, but with strict gun laws? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PerryComo
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3240 |
|
|
| 10 Jun 2013 10:05 AM |
the civil war
economy doesn't matter for crap when it's an apocalypse
~Any Guy Can Dock at My Port~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Jun 2013 10:06 AM |
Okay. Somalia and Great Britain which will last longer |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PerryComo
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3240 |
|
|
| 10 Jun 2013 10:07 AM |
well
neither is lasting longer as both governments will likely crash the second it actually gets to "apocalypse" level
by that time all countries would be nonexistent or remnants
~Any Guy Can Dock at My Port~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Jun 2013 10:10 AM |
if the government is aware of a virus before it ravage an entire county they should be able to stop it |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
PerryComo
|
  |
| Joined: 19 Nov 2012 |
| Total Posts: 3240 |
|
|
| 10 Jun 2013 10:11 AM |
but an APOCALYPSE is defined as one by having the mass population killed off (or in this case, infected)
~Any Guy Can Dock at My Port~ |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 10 Jun 2013 10:14 AM |
pretty much yea they can be preventable but since this is about an apocalypse now would a military like the USA fight it off? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|