|
| 05 Jun 2013 04:50 PM |
So, you wage war on someone, and SET A DEADLINE. Whoever gets the most raid wins in this time wins.
If they are reasonably close, then a final battle occurs.
Yes/no? |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Akios
|
  |
| Joined: 24 Apr 2008 |
| Total Posts: 684 |
|
|
| 05 Jun 2013 04:50 PM |
| This has been going on... for a long time. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
| |
|
LadyMoo
|
  |
| Joined: 25 Nov 2011 |
| Total Posts: 10506 |
|
|
| 05 Jun 2013 04:51 PM |
Yes; It's a better idea.
People just do final battles randomly which is stupid, |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
koen523
|
  |
| Joined: 23 Feb 2011 |
| Total Posts: 4026 |
|
| |
|
|
| 05 Jun 2013 04:52 PM |
| no one can agree on raid wins |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
|
| 05 Jun 2013 05:00 PM |
All raid wins would only count if proof was shown as evidence.
Any photos edited (if agreed with by C&G non-biasedally) would lead to an instant loss of the war unless the person who submitted such photo was exiled immediately and the photo was removed as evidence. |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|
Obtention
|
  |
| Joined: 07 Feb 2013 |
| Total Posts: 15509 |
|
|
| 05 Jun 2013 05:01 PM |
No, I believe wars should go on until one side surrenders.
If the war goes on ridiculously long, make a final battle that isn't RCL.
- Charles Obtention Radelek |
|
|
| Report Abuse |
|
|